Literature DB >> 10652503

Comparison of the European and USA practice guidelines for Osteoporosis.

J A Kanis1, D Torgerson, C Cooper.   

Abstract

The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease (EFFO), the Royal College of Physicians, the European Community and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA (NOF) have recently published guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. All adopt case-finding strategies but the conceptual approach between the European and North American guidelines differs fundamentally. This gives rise to differences in the populations identified for assessment and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10652503     DOI: 10.1016/s1043-2760(99)00214-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 1043-2760            Impact factor:   12.015


  12 in total

1.  An audit of bone densitometry practice with reference to ISCD, IOF and NOF guidelines.

Authors:  R Baddoura; H Awada; J Okais; M Salamoun; G Ayoub; N Ziadé; G El Hajj-Fuleihan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  [The periodic health examination: a comparison of United States and Canadian recommendations].

Authors:  Cléo Mavriplis; Guylène Thériault
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Incidence and costs of hip fractures compared to acute myocardial infarction in the Italian population: a 4-year survey.

Authors:  P Piscitelli; G Iolascon; F Gimigliano; M Muratore; P Camboa; O Borgia; B Forcina; F Fitto; V Robaud; G Termini; G B Rini; E Gianicolo; A Faino; M Rossini; S Adami; A Angeli; A Distante; S Gatto; R Gimigliano; G Guida
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Which screening strategy using BMD measurements would be most cost effective for hip fracture prevention in elderly women? A decision analysis based on a Markov model.

Authors:  A M Schott; C Ganne; D Hans; G Monnier; R Gauchoux; M A Krieg; P D Delmas; P J Meunier; C Colin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A comparison of case-finding strategies in the UK for the management of hip fractures.

Authors:  H Johansson; J A Kanis; A Oden; J Compston; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Selecting patients for osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 7.  Review of guidelines for testing and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Piet P M M Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Determinant factors of osteoporosis patients' reported therapeutic adherence to calcium and/or vitamin D supplements: a cross-sectional, observational study of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  José Sanfelix-Genovés; Vicente F Gil-Guillén; Domingo Orozco-Beltran; Vicente Giner-Ruiz; Salvador Pertusa-Martínez; Begoña Reig-Moya; Concepción Carratalá
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Clinical utility of laboratory testing in women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sophie A Jamal; Richard E Leiter; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Douglas C Bauer; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Serge C L M Cremers; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.