Literature DB >> 10651387

Guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.

P A Howard1.   

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major independent risk factor for stroke. AF is most commonly associated with nonvalvular cardiovascular disease and is especially frequent among the elderly. The annual risk for stroke in patients with AF is approximately 5% with a wide range depending on the presence of additional risk factors. For patients who cannot successfully be converted and maintained in normal sinus rhythm (NSR), antithrombotic therapy is an effective method for preventing stroke. The 2 drugs which are indicated for stroke prophylaxis in patients with AF are warfarin and aspirin. For primary prevention, warfarin reduces the risk of stroke approximately 68%. Aspirin therapy is less effective, resulting in a 20 to 30% risk reduction. Combination therapy with aspirin and low intensity warfarin adjusted to an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.2 to 1.5 has not been shown to be superior to standard intensity warfarin with a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. In patients with AF and a prior history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), the absolute risk reduction with warfarin is even greater because of the high risk of stroke in this population. In contrast, aspirin has not been shown to significantly reduce the risk of stroke in patients with AF when used for secondary prevention. When appropriately managed, warfarin is associated with a low risk of major bleeding. In controlled trials of highly selected patients, the annual rate of intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) with warfarin was approximately 0.3%. Studies have shown that specialty anticoagulation clinics can achieve similar low rates of major bleeding. However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the general population. Factors which have been identified as predictors of bleeding include advanced age, number of medications and most importantly, the intensity of anticoagulation. INR values above 4.0 have been associated with an increased risk of major bleeding while values below 2.0 have been associated with thrombosis. Slow careful dosage titration, regular laboratory monitoring and patient education can substantially reduce the risk of complications. In patients with AF, antithrombotic therapy has been shown to be cost effective. For high risk patients, warfarin is the most cost-effective therapy, provided the risks for bleeding are minimised. In contrast, aspirin is the most cost-effective agent for low risk patients. Current practice guidelines for stroke prophylaxis recommend warfarin (target INR 2.5: range 2.0 to 3.0) for AF patients at high risk for stroke including those over 75 years of age or younger patients with additional risk factors. Aspirin should be reserved for low risk patients or those unable to take warfarin. Although these recommendations are strongly supported by the clinical trial evidence, studies show that many patients are not receiving appropriate antithrombotic therapy. In particular, warfarin is underutilised in high risk elderly patients. Additional studies are needed to identify barriers that prevent implementation of the clinical trial findings into clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10651387     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199958060-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  47 in total

Review 1.  Atrial fibrillation and stroke: new ideas, persisting dilemmas.

Authors:  J L Halperin; R G Hart
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at low risk of stroke during treatment with aspirin: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III Study. The SPAF III Writing Committee for the Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Interaction of dietary factors with oral anticoagulants: review and applications.

Authors:  J E Harris
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1995-05

4.  Guidelines for medical treatment for stroke prevention. American College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Indobufen versus warfarin in the secondary prevention of major vascular events in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. SIFA (Studio Italiano Fibrillazione Atriale) Investigators.

Authors:  C Morocutti; G Amabile; F Fattapposta; A Nicolosi; S Matteoli; M Trappolini; G Cataldo; G Milanesi; M Lavezzari; F Pamparana; S Coccheri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Status of antithrombotic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation in university hospitals.

Authors:  G W Albers; J M Yim; K M Belew; N Bittar; C R Hattemer; B G Phillips; S Kemp; E A Hall; D J Morton; P H Vlasses
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-11-11

7.  Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage in outpatients taking warfarin.

Authors:  E M Hylek; D E Singer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Physician attitudes about anticoagulation for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the elderly.

Authors:  D C McCrory; D B Matchar; G Samsa; L L Sanders; E L Pritchett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-02-13

9.  Bleeding during antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. The Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-02-26

10.  Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications.

Authors:  W M Feinberg; J L Blackshear; A Laupacis; R Kronmal; R G Hart
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-03-13
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Triflusal: a review of its use in cerebral infarction and myocardial infarction, and as thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  David Murdoch; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Oral anticoagulant treatment: risk factors involved in 500 intracranial hemorrhages.

Authors:  A Cantalapiedra; O Gutierrez; J I Tortosa; M Yañez; M Dueñas; E Fernandez Fontecha; M J Peñarrubia; L J García-Frade
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  A review of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  David Dang; Raluca Arimie; L Julian Haywood
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Pharmaceutical care for elderly patients shared between community pharmacists and general practitioners: a randomised evaluation. RESPECT (Randomised Evaluation of Shared Prescribing for Elderly people in the Community over Time) [ISRCTN16932128].

Authors:  I Wong; P Campion; S Coulton; B Cross; H Edmondson; A Farrin; G Hill; A Hilton; Z Philips; S Richmond; I Russell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.