Literature DB >> 10650916

Suppression of apoptosis and induction of DNA synthesis in vitro by the phthalate plasticizers monoethylhexylphthalate (MEHP) and diisononylphthalate (DINP): a comparison of rat and human hepatocytes in vitro.

S C Hasmall1, N H James, N Macdonald, D West, S Chevalier, S C Cosulich, R A Roberts.   

Abstract

Diethylhexylphthalate (DEHP) and diisononylphthalate (DINP) are plasticizers with many important commercial, industrial and medical applications. However, both DEHP and DINP are rodent peroxisome proliferators (PPs), a class of compounds that cause rodent liver tumours associated with peroxisome proliferation, induction of hepatic DNA synthesis and the suppression of apoptosis. Despite these effects in the rodent, humans appear to be nonresponsive to the adverse effects of PPs. Previously, we have shown that the fibrate hypolipidaemic peroxisome proliferator, nafenopin, induced DNA synthesis and suppressed apoptosis in rat but not in human hepatocytes. In this work, we have examined species differences in the response of rat and human hepatocytes to DEHP and DINP in vitro. In rat hepatocytes in vitro, both DINP and MEHP (a principle metabolite of DEHP and the proximal peroxisome proliferator) caused a concentration-dependent induction of DNA synthesis and suppression of both spontaneous and transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta1)-induced apoptosis. Similarly, both MEHP and DINP caused a concentration-dependent induction of peroxisomal beta-oxidation although the response to DINP was less robust. In contrast to the pleiotropic response noted in rat hepatocytes, neither DINP nor MEHP caused an induction of beta-oxidation, stimulation of DNA synthesis and suppression of apoptosis in human hepatocytes cultured from three separate donors. These data provide evidence for species differences in the hepatic response to the phthalates DEHP and DINP, confirming that human hepatocytes appear to be refractory to the hepatocarcinogenic effects of PPs first noted in rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10650916     DOI: 10.1007/s002040050634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  6 in total

1.  Evaluating the potential genotoxicity of phthalates esters (PAEs) in perfumes using in vitro assays.

Authors:  Iman Al-Saleh; Tahreer Al-Rajudi; Ghofran Al-Qudaihi; Pulicat Manogaran
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Modes of action and species-specific effects of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the liver.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Jeffrey M Peters; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 3.  Recent updates on phthalate exposure and human health: a special focus on liver toxicity and stem cell regeneration.

Authors:  Sarva Mangala Praveena; Seoh Wei Teh; Ranjith Kumar Rajendran; Narayanan Kannan; Chu-Ching Lin; Rozaini Abdullah; Suresh Kumar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Jeffrey M Peters; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Is peroxisome proliferation an obligatory precursor step in the carcinogenicity of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP)?

Authors:  R L Melnick
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  A reexamination of the PPAR-alpha activation mode of action as a basis for assessing human cancer risks of environmental contaminants.

Authors:  Kathryn Z Guyton; Weihsueh A Chiu; Thomas F Bateson; Jennifer Jinot; Cheryl Siegel Scott; Rebecca C Brown; Jane C Caldwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.