Literature DB >> 10650380

Evaluating the clinical performance of the Osseotite implant: defining prosthetic predictability.

U Grunder, T Gaberthuel, N Boitel, M Imoberdorf, K Meyenberg, C Andreoni, T Meier.   

Abstract

A 5-year prospective, multicenter study is in progress at four private dental practices to determine the cumulative implant survival rate and prosthetic outcome when using the Osseotite dental implant in posterior maxillary and mandibular areas. An interim evaluation after 34.4 months of study progress is presented. A total of 219 Osseotite implants were placed in 74 patients (34 women and 40 men with a mean age of 57.8 +/- 15.2 years) using a conventional two-stage surgical protocol and 3- to 6-month healing time. Subsequently, patients were restored with fixed or removable restorations. Nineteen of the 74 patients reported smoking an average of 13.2 cigarettes per day. Restorative treatments included 40 single-unit restorations; 53 splinted 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-unit implant-supported maxillary and mandibular prostheses; 4 full-arch fixed maxillary prostheses; 1 mandibular fixed/detachable hybrid prosthesis; and 1 mandibular overdenture. The mean time from implant placement to second stage surgery was 6.2 +/- 2.0 months; from restoration and implant loading to the most recent follow-up evaluation was 20.9 +/- 6.8 months. Of the 219 implants placed, three posterior maxillary implants developed infections and were removed prior to second stage surgery. No implant failures occurred at second stage surgery or after implant loading. Using the Kaplan-Meier method, the cumulative implant survival rate was 100% for anterior implants and 98.4% for posterior implants at 28.5 +/- 5.7 months. The cumulative postloading implant survival rate was 100% for both anterior and posterior implants. The results of this study indicate that the Osseotite dental implant achieved a high rate of integration that remained stable during nearly 2 years of implant function. In addition, because no postloading implant failures have occurred, the Osseotite implant has provided a high level of prosthetic predictability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10650380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent        ISSN: 1548-8578


  3 in total

1.  Load bearing capacity of bone anchored fiber-reinforced composite device.

Authors:  Ahmed Mansour Ballo; Lippo V Lassila; Pekka K Vallittu; Timo O Närhi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Immediate provisionalization and nonfunctional loading of a single implant in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical presentation and parameters for consideration.

Authors:  Konstantinos X Michalakis; Christos D R Kalpidis; Yvone Kirmanidou; Hiroshi Hirayama; Pasquale Lino Calvani; Argiris L Pissiotis
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2013-12-08

3.  Smoking, radiotherapy, diabetes and osteoporosis as risk factors for dental implant failure: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Nizhou Liu; Xinchen Xu; Xinhua Qu; Eryi Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.