Literature DB >> 10649302

On the relative sample size required for multiple comparisons.

J S Witte1, R C Elston, L R Cardon.   

Abstract

Multiple comparisons are commonly made in epidemiologic and genetic research. How to appropriately adjust for multiple comparisons remains a controversial issue. This note demonstrates, however, that large increases in the number of comparisons has a limited effect on the sample size required to maintain an experimentwise alpha-level. In particular, the relative sample size required increases only linearly with the logarithm of the number of comparisons made. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10649302     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<369::aid-sim335>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  14 in total

1.  Genome-wide association studies and beyond.

Authors:  John S Witte
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 2.  Large recursive partitioning analysis of complex disease pharmacogenetic studies. II. Statistical considerations.

Authors:  Dmitri V Zaykin; S Stanley Young
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Rare genetic variants and treatment response: sample size and analysis issues.

Authors:  John S Witte
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Statistical considerations for analysis of microarray experiments.

Authors:  Kouros Owzar; William T Barry; Sin-Ho Jung
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 5.  The genetics of drug efficacy: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Matthew R Nelson; Toby Johnson; Liling Warren; Arlene R Hughes; Stephanie L Chissoe; Chun-Fang Xu; Dawn M Waterworth
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Polygenic modeling of genome-wide association studies: an application to prostate and breast cancer.

Authors:  John S Witte; Thomas J Hoffmann
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2011-02-24

7.  Power and sample size calculation for microarray studies.

Authors:  Sin-Ho Jung; S Stanley Young
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 8.  Methods for investigating gene-environment interactions in candidate pathway and genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Duncan Thomas
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 21.981

9.  Optimal two-stage genotyping in population-based association studies.

Authors:  Jaya M Satagopan; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Analyzes of genome-wide association follow-up study for calving traits in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Johanna K Höglund; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Mogens S Lund; Goutam Sahana
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.