Literature DB >> 10649154

Hypertrophy of labia minora: experience with 163 reductions.

R Rouzier1, C Louis-Sylvestre, B J Paniel, B Haddad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to describe the surgical procedure, its results, and its complications and to determine whether patients are satisfied with surgical reduction of labia minora in cases of hypertrophy. STUDY
DESIGN: The records of 163 patients who underwent reduction of the labia minora during a 9-year period were reviewed. The ages of the patients ranged from 12 to 67 years (median, 26). Motives for requesting surgery were aesthetic concerns in 87% of the cases, discomfort in clothing in 64%, discomfort with exercise in 26%, and entry dyspareunia in 43%. Anatomic results were assessed 1 month postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was assessed by means of a mailed questionnaire.
RESULTS: No surgery-related significant complications were noticed. Anatomic results were satisfactory for 151 patients (93%). Ninety-eight completed questionnaires were returned. Eighty-one patients (83%) found that the results after surgery were satisfactory. Eighty-seven (89%) were satisfied with the aesthetic result, and 91 (93%) approved the functional outcome. Four patients (4%) would not undergo the same procedure again.
CONCLUSION: Labia minora reduction is a simple surgical procedure associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10649154     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(00)70488-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  19 in total

1.  Normal vulvovaginal, perineal, and pelvic anatomy with reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Sujata Yavagal; Thais F de Farias; Carlos A Medina; Peter Takacs
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Nip, tuck and rejuvenate; the latest frontier for the gynecologic surgeon.

Authors:  Rachel N Pauls
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-05-26

Review 3.  Requests for cosmetic genitoplasty: how should healthcare providers respond?

Authors:  Lih Mei Liao; Sarah M Creighton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-26

Review 4.  Female genital cosmetic surgery: a review of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Ladin Yurteri-Kaplan; Red Alinsod
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Labiaplasty: motivation, techniques, and ethics.

Authors:  Müjde Özer; Indiana Mortimore; Elise P Jansma; Margriet G Mullender
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Surgical Interventions on the External Female Genitalia in Switzerland.

Authors:  R E Umbricht-Sprüngli; M Gsell
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 7.  Female Cosmetic Genital Surgery: Delivering What Women Want.

Authors:  Navneet Magon; Red Alinsod
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2016-08-10

8.  Individual male perception of female genitalia.

Authors:  Emma Horrocks; Jay Iyer; Althea Askern; Nadine Becuzzi; Venkat N Vangaveti; Ajay Rane
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Labia minora hypertrophy: causes, impact on women's health, and treatment options.

Authors:  Caterina Gulia; Andrea Zangari; Vito Briganti; Zhoobin H Bateni; Alessandro Porrello; Roberto Piergentili
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 10.  The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Heather J Furnas; Francisco L Canales; Rachel A Pedreira; Carly Comer; Samuel J Lin; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.