BACKGROUND: Low vitamin B-12 status is prevalent among the elderly, but few studies have examined the association between vitamin B-12 status and intake. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that vitamin B-12 concentrations vary according to intake source. DESIGN: Plasma concentrations and dietary intakes were assessed cross-sectionally for 2999 subjects in the Framingham Offspring Study. The prevalence of vitamin B-12 concentrations <148, 185, and 258 pmol/L was examined by age group (26-49, 50-64, and 65-83 y), supplement use, and the following food intake sources: fortified breakfast cereal, dairy products, and meat. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of subjects had plasma vitamin B-12 concentrations <258 pmol/L, 17% had concentrations <185 pmol/L, and 9% had concentrations <148 pmol/L, with little difference between age groups. Supplement users were significantly less likely than non-supplement-users to have concentrations <185 pmol/L (8% compared with 20%, respectively). Among non-supplement-users, there were significant differences between those who consumed fortified cereal >4 times/wk (12%) and those who consumed no fortified cereal (23%) and between those in the highest and those in the lowest tertile of dairy intake (13% compared with 24%, respectively), but no significant differences by meat tertile. Regression of plasma vitamin B-12 on log of intake, by source, yielded significant slopes for each contributor adjusted for the others. For the total group, b = 40.6 for vitamin B-12 from vitamin supplements. Among non-supplement-users, b = 56.4 for dairy products, 35.2 for cereal, and 16.7 for meat. Only the meat slope differed significantly from the others. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous reports, plasma vitamin B-12 concentrations were associated with vitamin B-12 intake. Use of supplements, fortified cereal, and milk appears to protect against lower concentrations. Further research is needed to investigate possible differences in bioavailability.
BACKGROUND: Low vitamin B-12 status is prevalent among the elderly, but few studies have examined the association between vitamin B-12 status and intake. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that vitamin B-12 concentrations vary according to intake source. DESIGN: Plasma concentrations and dietary intakes were assessed cross-sectionally for 2999 subjects in the Framingham Offspring Study. The prevalence of vitamin B-12 concentrations <148, 185, and 258 pmol/L was examined by age group (26-49, 50-64, and 65-83 y), supplement use, and the following food intake sources: fortified breakfast cereal, dairy products, and meat. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of subjects had plasma vitamin B-12 concentrations <258 pmol/L, 17% had concentrations <185 pmol/L, and 9% had concentrations <148 pmol/L, with little difference between age groups. Supplement users were significantly less likely than non-supplement-users to have concentrations <185 pmol/L (8% compared with 20%, respectively). Among non-supplement-users, there were significant differences between those who consumed fortified cereal >4 times/wk (12%) and those who consumed no fortified cereal (23%) and between those in the highest and those in the lowest tertile of dairy intake (13% compared with 24%, respectively), but no significant differences by meat tertile. Regression of plasma vitamin B-12 on log of intake, by source, yielded significant slopes for each contributor adjusted for the others. For the total group, b = 40.6 for vitamin B-12 from vitamin supplements. Among non-supplement-users, b = 56.4 for dairy products, 35.2 for cereal, and 16.7 for meat. Only the meat slope differed significantly from the others. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with previous reports, plasma vitamin B-12 concentrations were associated with vitamin B-12 intake. Use of supplements, fortified cereal, and milk appears to protect against lower concentrations. Further research is needed to investigate possible differences in bioavailability.
Authors: Lindsay H Allen; Joshua W Miller; Lisette de Groot; Irwin H Rosenberg; A David Smith; Helga Refsum; Daniel J Raiten Journal: J Nutr Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Aurelie Chanson; Laurence D Parnell; Eric D Ciappio; Zhenhua Liu; Jimmy W Crott; Katherine L Tucker; Joel B Mason Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-04-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: J P van Wijngaarden; R A M Dhonukshe-Rutten; E M Brouwer-Brolsma; A W Enneman; K M A Swart; S C van Dijk; P H In 't Veld; N M van Schoor; N van der Velde; R de Jonge; P Lips; A G Uitterlinden; L C P G M de Groot Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Yannis Manios; George Moschonis; Renske Dekkers; Christina Mavrogianni; Eva Grammatikaki; Ellen van den Heuvel Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Tinu Mary Samuel; Christopher Duggan; Tinku Thomas; Ronald Bosch; Ramya Rajendran; Suvi M Virtanen; Krishnamachari Srinivasan; Anura V Kurpad Journal: Ann Nutr Metab Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 3.374