OBJECTIVE: Acute phase serum amyloid A (A-SAA) has been reported to be more sensitive than C-reactive protein (CRP) as a marker of disease activity. It may function in immune regulation and is linked to the development of secondary amyloidosis. We investigated the profile of A-SAA in early inflammatory arthritis and compared A-SAA with CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in relation to diagnosis and disease activity. METHODS: Using a sensitive and specific ELISA, A-SAA was measured in the serum of 140 patients with early arthritis (disease duration 2 weeks to 24 mo, mean 6 mo). CRP was determined using a standard ELISA; ESR and clinical disease activity variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 19 psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 28 undifferentiated arthritis (UA), and 29 other forms of arthritis. A-SAA levels correlated with both CRP (r = 0.73, p = 0.0001) and ESR (r = 0.6, p = 0.0001). The magnitude of the A-SAA response was greater than either the CRP or ESR, and very high A-SAA levels were observed in disease as early as 2 weeks. Highest A-SAA concentrations occurred in RA (median 70.3 mg/l, maximum 1542) compared with the other groups (medians, PsA: 33 mg/l; UA: 12.3 mg/l; other arthritis: 11.2 mg/l), with values > 520 mg/l observed exclusively in RA. A-SAA, unlike CRP or ESR, could distinguish patients with a final diagnosis of RA from those who had persistent UA. In RA, A-SAA provided the strongest correlations with clinical measurements of disease activity. Clinical improvement was also best represented by A-SAA, while disease deterioration was associated with a significant increase in A-SAA values, but not CRP or ESR. CONCLUSION: Compared with ESR or CRP, A-SAA correlates best with markers of disease activity, and in patients with recent onset arthritis, very high levels of SAA occur exclusively in RA. As A-SAA is sensitive to change and accurately reflects alterations in disease status, it is the best marker available for the assessment of inflammatory joint disease.
OBJECTIVE: Acute phase serum amyloid A (A-SAA) has been reported to be more sensitive than C-reactive protein (CRP) as a marker of disease activity. It may function in immune regulation and is linked to the development of secondary amyloidosis. We investigated the profile of A-SAA in early inflammatory arthritis and compared A-SAA with CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in relation to diagnosis and disease activity. METHODS: Using a sensitive and specific ELISA, A-SAA was measured in the serum of 140 patients with early arthritis (disease duration 2 weeks to 24 mo, mean 6 mo). CRP was determined using a standard ELISA; ESR and clinical disease activity variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 19 psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 28 undifferentiated arthritis (UA), and 29 other forms of arthritis. A-SAA levels correlated with both CRP (r = 0.73, p = 0.0001) and ESR (r = 0.6, p = 0.0001). The magnitude of the A-SAA response was greater than either the CRP or ESR, and very high A-SAA levels were observed in disease as early as 2 weeks. Highest A-SAA concentrations occurred in RA (median 70.3 mg/l, maximum 1542) compared with the other groups (medians, PsA: 33 mg/l; UA: 12.3 mg/l; other arthritis: 11.2 mg/l), with values > 520 mg/l observed exclusively in RA. A-SAA, unlike CRP or ESR, could distinguish patients with a final diagnosis of RA from those who had persistent UA. In RA, A-SAA provided the strongest correlations with clinical measurements of disease activity. Clinical improvement was also best represented by A-SAA, while disease deterioration was associated with a significant increase in A-SAA values, but not CRP or ESR. CONCLUSION: Compared with ESR or CRP, A-SAA correlates best with markers of disease activity, and in patients with recent onset arthritis, very high levels of SAA occur exclusively in RA. As A-SAA is sensitive to change and accurately reflects alterations in disease status, it is the best marker available for the assessment of inflammatory joint disease.
Authors: Michelle B Christensen; Rebecca Langhorn; Amelia Goddard; Eva B Andreasen; Elena Moldal; Asta Tvarijonaviciute; Jolle Kirpensteijn; Sabrina Jakobsen; Frida Persson; Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Katarzyna Lundmark; Gunilla T Westermark; Sofia Nyström; Charles L Murphy; Alan Solomon; Per Westermark Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-05-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ronan Hugh Mullan; Jennifer McCormick; Mary Connolly; Barry Bresnihan; Douglas James Veale; Ursula Fearon Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Irina N Baranova; Alexander V Bocharov; Tatyana G Vishnyakova; Roger Kurlander; Zhigang Chen; Dong Fu; Irwin M Arias; Gyorgy Csako; Amy P Patterson; Thomas L Eggerman Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 5.157