Literature DB >> 10647656

Logistic regression and survival analysis of 450 impotent patients treated with injection therapy: long-term dropout parameters.

Y Vardi1, E Sprecher, I Gruenwald.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We report the dropout rate associated with intracavernosal self-injection for erectile dysfunction at long-term followup, and determine parameters related to dropout.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 2,252 impotent patients evaluated during 9 years 450 (20%) enrolled in our self-injection program. Papaverine and phentolamine were given in 53% (initial treatment), prostaglandin E1 in 21%, and papaverine, phentolamine and prostaglandin E1 (triple mixture) in 26% of cases. Average injection volume for the 3 injection types was 0.52 cc. Data were retrospectively reviewed for patient dropout versus nondropout, specifically for type of drug, volume injected, changing treatment (from 1 drug and/or dosage to another), patient age, marital status, ethnic group, impotence duration and diabetes.
RESULTS: Patient age ranged from 23 to 79 years (mean age 55). Of the patients treated at least 4 months 155 (35%) dropped out of the study. Mean treatment duration was 3.5 years. Logistic regression suggested that type of drug, changing treatment during the course of therapy and dosage (volume injected) were the only significant (p <0.05) parameters influencing dropout. Papaverine and phentolamine were twice as likely to lead to dropout as triple mixture or prostaglandin E1, and injection greater than 0.5 cc was more than twice as likely to lead to dropout. Demographic, ethnic, age and etiological factors had no significant effect on the overall dropout rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness of injection therapy was an underlying factor determining the long-term dropout rate for patients with erectile dysfunction. Other parameters or combinations of parameters that may influence patient dropout remain to be explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  Erectile dysfunction and diabetes: A melting pot of circumstances and treatments.

Authors:  Giuseppe Defeudis; Rossella Mazzilli; Marta Tenuta; Giovanni Rossini; Virginia Zamponi; Soraya Olana; Antongiulio Faggiano; Paolo Pozzilli; Andrea M Isidori; Daniele Gianfrilli
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 8.128

Review 2.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Looking to the future for erectile dysfunction therapies.

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multi-Center Therapeutic Confirmatory Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Avanafil in Korean Patients with Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Hyun Jun Park; Sae Woong Kim; Je Jong Kim; Sung Won Lee; Jae Seung Paick; Tae Young Ahn; Kwangsung Park; Jong Kwan Park; Nam Cheol Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Efficacy and safety of an herbal formula (KBMSI-2) in the treatment of erectile dysfunction: A preliminary clinical study.

Authors:  Nam Cheol Park; Sae Woong Kim; Sung Yeoun Hwang; Hyun Jun Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 6.  Korean Society for Sexual Medicine and Andrology (KSSMA) Guideline on Erectile Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ji Kan Ryu; Kang Su Cho; Su Jin Kim; Kyung Jin Oh; Sung Chul Kam; Kyung Keun Seo; Hong Seok Shin; Soo Woong Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 5.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.