Literature DB >> 10647646

Renal cell carcinoma: prognostic significance of incidentally detected tumors.

K H Tsui1, O Shvarts, R B Smith, R Figlin, J B de Kernion, A Belldegrun.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the prognostic significance of incidentally discovered renal cell carcinoma in the era of increased incidental detection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 633 consecutive patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma at our institution between 1987 and 1998. Patients were divided into those who were asymptomatic and tumor was diagnosed incidentally and those diagnosed after presenting with any of the classic symptoms of renal cell carcinoma or subsequent metastasis. All renal cell carcinoma lesions were assigned a stage and grade according to 1997 TNM criteria. All patients were followed postoperatively to assess survival rates, and monitor recurrence and metastasis.
RESULTS: Of the 633 patients 95 (15%) were treated for incidentally discovered renal cell carcinoma and 538 (85%) presented with symptoms secondary to renal cell carcinoma at diagnosis. Patient age and sex distribution were similar in the 2 groups. Stage I lesions were observed in 62.1% of patients with incidental renal cell carcinoma and in 23% with symptomatic renal cell carcinoma. In contrast, stage IV lesions were present in 27.4% of patients with incidental versus 54% with symptomatic renal cell carcinoma. Thus, incidental lesions were of significantly lower stage than those causing symptoms (p <0.001). Similarly 15.8% of incidental but 42.4% of symptomatic lesions were grade 3 or 4 (p = 0.006). Patients were followed postoperatively for a mean of 47 months plus or minus 40 months. The 5-year cancer specific survival rate was significantly higher for incidental than for symptomatic tumors (85.3% versus 62.5%). Likewise, the local and distal recurrence rates were higher for symptomatic lesions. When adjusted for stage, no difference in survival was noted in the 2 groups for stages I to III disease and a minimally significant difference was noted for stage IV cancer. Multivariate analysis of stage and grade attributed the survival difference in stage IV disease to the significantly higher grade of symptomatic lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: At presentation incidental tumors are of significantly lower stage and grade than tumors producing symptoms. Subsequently these clinically and histologically less aggressive lesions lead to better patient survival and decreased recurrence. Thus, the detection of renal cell carcinoma before symptom onset enables treatment of less aggressive tumors and provides a better prognosis for patients. Given these data efforts should be directed toward the development of a screening protocol to detect these lesions early, so that they may be prevented from progressing to the point when symptoms are apparent and prognosis becomes worse. In addition, the significant correlation of tumor grade with survival in our study further demonstrates the prognostic value of tumor grade and molecular markers for the future evaluation and treatment of renal cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647646     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)67892-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  52 in total

1.  [Partial nephrectomy. Rationale and limitations of an organ-preserving approach].

Authors:  J Casuscelli; C Gratzke; C G Stief; M Staehler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Should there be a size limit for elective nephron-sparing surgery?

Authors:  Kent G Krejci; Bradley C Leibovich
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Renal cell carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment, 1994-2003.

Authors:  Thomas E Hutson
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-10

4.  The emergence of surgeon-controlled robotic surgery in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Timil H Patel; Paurush Babbar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 5.  Radiofrequency thermal ablation of renal tumors.

Authors:  Massimo De Filippo; Francesca Bozzetti; Rosa Martora; Raffaella Zagaria; Stefania Ferretti; Luca Macarini; Luca Brunese; Antonio Rotondo; Cristina Rossi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Incidental finding of renal cell carcinoma in recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Authors:  J M L Williamson; T C König; R Canelo
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Renal cell carcinoma in a patient with cystinosis and inflammatory bowel disease: a case report.

Authors:  Cheryl Cameron; Larry Greenbaum; Thomas Sato; Beth Trost; Brian Lundeen; Michael E Kelly
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 3.714

8.  Robotic-assisted transperitoneal nephron-sparing surgery for small renal masses with associated surgical procedures: surgical technique and preliminary experience.

Authors:  Graziano Ceccarelli; Massimo Codacci-Pisanelli; Alberto Patriti; Cecilia Ceribelli; Alessia Biancafarina; Luciano Casciola
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2013-04-26

9.  Phase I/II trial of 5-fluorouracil and a noncytotoxic dose level of suramin in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Saby George; Robert Dreicer; Jessie J L Au; Tong Shen; Brian I Rini; Susan Roman; Matthew M Cooney; Tarek Mekhail; Paul Elson; Guillaume M Wientjes; Ram Ganapathi; Ronald M Bukowski
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Renal cell carcinoma: Impact of mode of detection on its pathological characteristics.

Authors:  Paresh Jain; R Surdas; Pallavi Aga; Manoj Jain; Rakesh Kapoor; Aneesh Srivastava; Anil Mandhani
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.