Literature DB >> 10647623

S values for radionuclides localized within the skeleton.

L G Bouchet1, W E Bolch, R W Howell, D V Rao.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Calculations of radiation absorbed dose to the active marrow are important to radionuclide therapies such as radioimmunotherapy and bone pain palliation. In diagnostic nuclear medicine, calculations of the effective dose for radiopharmaceutical procedures also require the assessment of radiation dose to the skeletal endosteum. We have previously reported the development of 2 3-dimensional electron transport models for assessing absorbed fractions to both marrow and endosteum in trabecular and cortical bone, respectively. Here, we extend these calculations to the assignment of radionuclide S values.
METHODS: Data published in International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 70 were used to develop tables of masses for total marrow space, active and inactive marrow, endosteum, and bone matrix within 22 skeletal sites in the adult. Using our site-specific tissue masses, along with electron absorbed fractions given by our 3-dimensional transport models, radionuclide S values (electron and beta particle components only) were subsequently calculated using the MIRD schema for 32P, 33P, 89Sr, 90Sr, 90Y, 117mSn, 153Sm, 169Er, 177Lu, and 186Re. Specific consideration was given to the trabecular active marrow as both a source and a target region.
RESULTS: Site-specific radionuclide S values are reported for 22 skeletal sites, for 9 source-target tissue combinations within trabecular bone, and for 6 source-target tissue combinations within cortical bone. Skeletal-averaged S values are also provided.
CONCLUSION: A fully documented model is presented for the adult for use in radionuclide dosimetry of the skeleton. The model is based on both the latest international recommendations for skeletal tissue masses and results from three-dimensional electron transport calculations within the skeleton. Comparisons are additionally made against the radionuclide S values published in MIRD Pamphlet No. 11 and those calculated using the MIRDOSE2 and MIRDOSE3 computer codes. Differences in these datasets vary with the source-target combination considered and may be attributed to 1 of 3 causes: (a) assumptions on reference target masses, (b) transport models used to assign absorbed fractions, and (c) implicit assumptions made in considering the trabecular active marrow as both a source and a target tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10647623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

1.  EANM Dosimetry Committee guidelines for bone marrow and whole-body dosimetry.

Authors:  Cecilia Hindorf; Gerhard Glatting; Carlo Chiesa; Ola Lindén; Glenn Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  An image-based skeletal dosimetry model for the ICRP reference adult male--internal electron sources.

Authors:  Matthew Hough; Perry Johnson; Didier Rajon; Derek Jokisch; Choonsik Lee; Wesley Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Validation of prospective whole-body bone marrow dosimetry by SPECT/CT multimodality imaging in (131)I-anti-CD20 rituximab radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Jan A Boucek; J Harvey Turner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  An update on computational anthropomorphic anatomical models.

Authors:  Azadeh Akhavanallaf; Hadi Fayad; Yazdan Salimi; Antar Aly; Hassan Kharita; Huda Al Naemi; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Modeling the time dependent distribution of a new (153)Sm complex for targeted radiotherapy purpose.

Authors:  Dariush Sardari; Amir Hakimi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2012-08-02

6.  Radiopharmaceutical therapy of bone metastases with 89SrCl2, 186Re-HEDP and 153Sm-EDTMP: a dosimetric study using Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  L Strigari; R Sciuto; M D'Andrea; R Pasqualoni; M Benassi; C L Maini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Bone lesion absorbed dose profiles in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with molecular radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ana M Denis-Bacelar; Sarah J Chittenden; V Ralph McCready; Antigoni Divoli; David P Dearnaley; Joe M O'Sullivan; Bernadette Johnson; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.