OBJECTIVES: To determine in patients with acoustic neuromas the predictive factors of hearing preservation according to clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological parameters and to evaluate, for each of these predictive factors, the percentage of patients with preserved hearing. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved 107 candidates for hearing preservation attempt. Mean age was 49.7 +/- 11.4 years. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were prospectively studied. Quantitative parameters were age, duration of functional complaints, hearing loss assessed by pure tone and speech audiometry, and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Qualitative parameters (expressed in percentage of presence) were sex, functional complaints, vestibular deficit revealed by vestibular testings, well-shaped ABRs, wave I, III, or V of ABRs, and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups according to whether their hearing was preserved (52.3%) or not preserved (47.7%). First, quantitative and qualitative factors were compared between both groups to identify predictive factors. Second, all patients were considered together and the percentage of hearing preservation was determined according to the presence of each predictive factor. RESULTS: The results confirmed the predictive value of classic parameters such as preoperative hearing level, radiological data, and trace of ABRs. They also emphasized the predictive role of other parameters such as short duration of hearing loss, presence of wave III in ABRs, and presence of TEOAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The size of the tumor and the preoperative hearing levels are longstanding predictive factors of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery, and candidates for hearing preservation are therefore now selected according to these factors. This study added more recent predictive factors and, among the 10 factors identified as predictive, the most relevant to hearing preservation were the presence of TEOAEs (69.7%), short duration of hearing loss (66.7%), and presence of wave III in ABRs (66.7%).
OBJECTIVES: To determine in patients with acoustic neuromas the predictive factors of hearing preservation according to clinical, radiological, and electrophysiological parameters and to evaluate, for each of these predictive factors, the percentage of patients with preserved hearing. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved 107 candidates for hearing preservation attempt. Mean age was 49.7 +/- 11.4 years. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were prospectively studied. Quantitative parameters were age, duration of functional complaints, hearing loss assessed by pure tone and speech audiometry, and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). Qualitative parameters (expressed in percentage of presence) were sex, functional complaints, vestibular deficit revealed by vestibular testings, well-shaped ABRs, wave I, III, or V of ABRs, and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs). METHODS:Patients were divided into two groups according to whether their hearing was preserved (52.3%) or not preserved (47.7%). First, quantitative and qualitative factors were compared between both groups to identify predictive factors. Second, all patients were considered together and the percentage of hearing preservation was determined according to the presence of each predictive factor. RESULTS: The results confirmed the predictive value of classic parameters such as preoperative hearing level, radiological data, and trace of ABRs. They also emphasized the predictive role of other parameters such as short duration of hearing loss, presence of wave III in ABRs, and presence of TEOAEs. CONCLUSIONS: The size of the tumor and the preoperative hearing levels are longstanding predictive factors of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery, and candidates for hearing preservation are therefore now selected according to these factors. This study added more recent predictive factors and, among the 10 factors identified as predictive, the most relevant to hearing preservation were the presence of TEOAEs (69.7%), short duration of hearing loss (66.7%), and presence of wave III in ABRs (66.7%).