Literature DB >> 10643747

Quantifying human circadian pacemaker response to brief, extended, and repeated light stimuli over the phototopic range.

R E Kronauer1, D B Forger, M E Jewett.   

Abstract

The authors' previous models have been able to describe accurately the effects of extended (approximately 5 h) bright-light (>4000 lux) stimuli on the phase and amplitude of the human circadian pacemaker, but they are not sufficient to represent the surprising human sensitivity to both brief pulses of bright light and light of more moderate intensities. Therefore, the authors have devised a new model in which a dynamic stimulus processor (Process L) intervenes between the light stimuli and the traditional representation of the circadian pacemaker as a self-sustaining limit-cycle oscillator (Process P). The overall model incorporating Process L and Process P is intended to allow the prediction of phase shifts to photic stimuli of any temporal pattern (extended and brief light episodes) and any light intensity in the photopic range. Two time constants emerge in the Process L model: the characteristic duration for necessary bright-light pulses to achieve their full effect (5-10 min) and the characteristic stimulus-free (dark) interval that can be tolerated without incurring an excessive penalty in phase shifting (30-80 min). The effect of reducing light intensity is incorporated in Process L as an extension of the time necessary for the light pulse to be fully realized (a power-law relation between time and intensity). This new model generates a number of new testable hypotheses, including the surprising prediction that 24-h cycles consisting of 8 h of darkness and 16 h of only approximately 3.5 lux would be capable of entraining a large fraction of the adult population (approximately 45%). Experimental data on the response of the human circadian system to lower light intensities and briefer stimuli are needed to allow for further refinement and validation of the model proposed here.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Discipline Space Human Factors; Non-NASA Center

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10643747     DOI: 10.1177/074873099129001073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Rhythms        ISSN: 0748-7304            Impact factor:   3.182


  56 in total

1.  A phase response curve to single bright light pulses in human subjects.

Authors:  Sat Bir S Khalsa; Megan E Jewett; Christian Cajochen; Charles A Czeisler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Characterizing and modeling the intrinsic light response of rat ganglion-cell photoreceptors.

Authors:  Olivia J Walch; L Samantha Zhang; Aaron N Reifler; Michael E Dolikian; Daniel B Forger; Kwoon Y Wong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Prediction of probabilistic sleep distributions following travel across multiple time zones.

Authors:  David Darwent; Drew Dawson; Greg D Roach
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Circadian phase resetting by a single short-duration light exposure.

Authors:  Shadab A Rahman; Melissa A St Hilaire; Anne-Marie Chang; Nayantara Santhi; Jeanne F Duffy; Richard E Kronauer; Charles A Czeisler; Steven W Lockley; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-04-06

5.  A physiologically based mathematical model of melatonin including ocular light suppression and interactions with the circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Melissa A St Hilaire; Claude Gronfier; Jamie M Zeitzer; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  J Pineal Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 13.007

6.  Are short (blue) wavelengths necessary for light treatment of seasonal affective disorder?

Authors:  J L Anderson; M A St Hilaire; R R Auger; C A Glod; S J Crow; A N Rivera; S M Fuentes Salgado; S J Pullen; T K Kaufman; A J Selby; D J Wolfe
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Learning to live on a Mars day: fatigue countermeasures during the Phoenix Mars Lander mission.

Authors:  Laura K Barger; Jason P Sullivan; Andrea S Vincent; Edna R Fiedler; Laurence M McKenna; Erin E Flynn-Evans; Kirby Gilliland; Walter E Sipes; Peter H Smith; George C Brainard; Steven W Lockley
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Comparison of amplitude recovery dynamics of two limit cycle oscillator models of the human circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  Premananda Indic; Daniel B Forger; Melissa A St Hilaire; Dennis A Dean; Emery N Brown; Richard E Kronauer; Elizabeth B Klerman; Megan E Jewett
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Are Individual Differences in Sleep and Circadian Timing Amplified by Use of Artificial Light Sources?

Authors:  Krithika Swaminathan; Elizabeth B Klerman; Andrew J K Phillips
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2017-04-02       Impact factor: 3.182

10.  A mathematical model of the circadian phase-shifting effects of exogenous melatonin.

Authors:  Emily R Breslow; Andrew J K Phillips; Jean M Huang; Melissa A St Hilaire; Elizabeth B Klerman
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.