Literature DB >> 10643696

Factors predicting response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: the importance of disease duration.

J J Anderson1, G Wells, A C Verhoeven, D T Felson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use individual patient data from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials to identify factors that affect the response to treatment as defined by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for improvement (the "ACR response").
METHODS: Primary trial data from 14 diverse, randomized, controlled trials of second-line drugs or devices in RA were analyzed. The trials included 11 methotrexate (MTX) trials (5 placebo controlled and 6 comparative, of which 2 were unpublished), 1 combination trial of cyclosporine plus MTX, 1 induction trial of a combination treatment in early RA (the COBRA trial), and 1 placebo-controlled trial of a new device (Prosorba). Both patient factors and disease activity measures (primarily, items from the ACR core criteria set) were available.
RESULTS: A total of 1,435 patients (549 in placebo-controlled trials, 886 in comparative trials) were studied. In both active treatment and placebo groups, disease duration had a strong effect on the likelihood of patient response (e.g., with any active treatment, the response rate was 53% for patients with < or =1 year of disease, 43% for 1-2 years' disease duration, 44% for 2-5 years, 38% for 5-10 years, and 35% for > 10 years; P = 0.001). Decreasing response with greater disease duration was seen during treatment with most of the individual active drugs, as well as with placebo. Other factors decreasing the rate of response to treatment included any prior use of a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), higher disease functional class (according to the Steinbrocker criteria), low disease activity (according to patient's global assessment), and female sex. Each ACR core set variable exhibited a diminished response to treatment in patients with long-standing disease. The difference between active treatment and placebo response rates was not affected by disease duration nor by other factors associated with the ACR response.
CONCLUSION: RA patients with longer disease duration do not respond as well to treatment compared with patients with early disease, and female sex, prior DMARD use, disease functional class, and disease activity also have effects on the likelihood of patient response to treatment. This has implications for trial interpretation and for the clinical expectations of RA patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10643696     DOI: 10.1002/1529-0131(200001)43:1<22::AID-ANR4>3.0.CO;2-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  132 in total

1.  MicroRNA-132, miR-146a, and miR-155 as potential biomarkers of methotrexate response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Ankita Singh; Pradeepta Sekhar Patro; Amita Aggarwal
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis and prevention of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Kristen Demoruelle; Kevin D Deane
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  Wait times to rheumatology care for patients with rheumatic diseases: a data linkage study of primary care electronic medical records and administrative data.

Authors:  Jessica Widdifield; Sasha Bernatsky; J Carter Thorne; Claire Bombardier; R Liisa Jaakkimainen; Laura Wing; J Michael Paterson; Noah Ivers; Debra Butt; Anne Lyddiatt; Catherine Hofstetter; Vandana Ahluwalia; Karen Tu
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-05-11

4.  Synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug prescribing variability in rheumatoid arthritis: a multilevel analysis of a cross-sectional national study.

Authors:  Iván Ferraz-Amaro; Daniel Seoane-Mato; Fernando Sánchez-Alonso; María A Martín-Martínez
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  [Early diagnosis of chronic systemic inflammatory disorders].

Authors:  B Hellmich; F Merkel; M Weber; W L Gross
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  EULAR recommendations for the management of early arthritis: report of a task force of the European Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT).

Authors:  B Combe; R Landewe; C Lukas; H D Bolosiu; F Breedveld; M Dougados; P Emery; G Ferraccioli; J M W Hazes; L Klareskog; K Machold; E Martin-Mola; H Nielsen; A Silman; J Smolen; H Yazici
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Survival and effectiveness of leflunomide compared with methotrexate and sulfasalazine in rheumatoid arthritis: a matched observational study.

Authors:  D Aletaha; T Stamm; T Kapral; G Eberl; J Grisar; K P Machold; J S Smolen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Does disease duration influence the exercise training responses of patients with type 2 diabetes?

Authors:  Bong-Sup Park; Andy V Khamoui; Lee E Brown; Do-Youn Kim; Kyung-Ah Han; Kyung-Wan Min; Geun-Hee An
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Clinical response within 12 weeks as a predictor of future low disease activity in patients with early RA: results from the TEAR Trial.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Curtis; Theresa McVie; Ted R Mikuls; Richard J Reynolds; Iris Navarro-Millán; James O'Dell; Larry W Moreland; S Louis Bridges; Veena K Ranganath; Stacey S Cofield
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  M J Harrison; L M Davies; N J Bansback; M J McCoy; S M M Verstappen; K Watson; D P M Symmons
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.