OBJECTIVE: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to validate estimates of muscle and adipose tissue (AT) in lower limb sections obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) modelling. DESIGN: MRI measurements were used as reference for validating limb muscle and AT estimates obtained by DXA models that assume fat-free soft tissue (FFST) comprised mainly muscle: model A accounted for bone hydration only; model B also applied constants for FFST in bone and skin and fat in muscle and AT; model C was as model B but allowing for variable fat in muscle and AT. SUBJECTS: Healthy men (n = 8) and women (n = 8), ages 41-62y; mean (s.d.) body mass indices (BMIs) of 28.6 (5.4) kg/m2 and 25.1 (5.4) kg/m2, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: MRI scans of the legs and whole body DXA scans were analysed for muscle and AT content of thigh (20 cm) and lower leg (10 cm) sections; 24h creatinine excretion was measured. RESULTS: Model A overestimated thigh muscle volume (MRI mean, 2.3 l) substantially (bias 0.36 l), whereas model B underestimated it by only 2% (bias 0.045 l). Lower leg muscle (MRI mean, 0.6 l) was better predicted using model A (bias 0.04 l, 7% overestimate) than model B (bias 0.1 l, 17% underestimate). The 95% limits of agreement were high for these models (thigh, +/-20%; lower leg, +/-47%). Model C predictions were more discrepant than those of model B. There was generally less agreement between MRI and all DXA models for AT. Measurement variability was generally less for DXA measurements of FFST (coefficient of variation 0.7-1.8%) and fat (0.8-3.3%) than model B estimates of muscle (0.5-2.6%) and AT (3.3-6.8%), respectively. Despite strong relationships between them, muscle mass was overestimated by creatinine excretion with highly variable predictability. CONCLUSION: This study has shown the value of DXA models for assessment of muscle and AT in leg sections, but suggests the need to re-evaluate some of the assumptions upon which they are based.
OBJECTIVE: To use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to validate estimates of muscle and adipose tissue (AT) in lower limb sections obtained by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) modelling. DESIGN: MRI measurements were used as reference for validating limb muscle and AT estimates obtained by DXA models that assume fat-free soft tissue (FFST) comprised mainly muscle: model A accounted for bone hydration only; model B also applied constants for FFST in bone and skin and fat in muscle and AT; model C was as model B but allowing for variable fat in muscle and AT. SUBJECTS: Healthy men (n = 8) and women (n = 8), ages 41-62y; mean (s.d.) body mass indices (BMIs) of 28.6 (5.4) kg/m2 and 25.1 (5.4) kg/m2, respectively. MEASUREMENTS: MRI scans of the legs and whole body DXA scans were analysed for muscle and AT content of thigh (20 cm) and lower leg (10 cm) sections; 24h creatinine excretion was measured. RESULTS: Model A overestimated thigh muscle volume (MRI mean, 2.3 l) substantially (bias 0.36 l), whereas model B underestimated it by only 2% (bias 0.045 l). Lower leg muscle (MRI mean, 0.6 l) was better predicted using model A (bias 0.04 l, 7% overestimate) than model B (bias 0.1 l, 17% underestimate). The 95% limits of agreement were high for these models (thigh, +/-20%; lower leg, +/-47%). Model C predictions were more discrepant than those of model B. There was generally less agreement between MRI and all DXA models for AT. Measurement variability was generally less for DXA measurements of FFST (coefficient of variation 0.7-1.8%) and fat (0.8-3.3%) than model B estimates of muscle (0.5-2.6%) and AT (3.3-6.8%), respectively. Despite strong relationships between them, muscle mass was overestimated by creatinine excretion with highly variable predictability. CONCLUSION: This study has shown the value of DXA models for assessment of muscle and AT in leg sections, but suggests the need to re-evaluate some of the assumptions upon which they are based.
Authors: Wei Shen; ZiMian Wang; Mark Punyanita; Jianbo Lei; Ahmet Sinav; John G Kral; Celina Imielinska; Robert Ross; Steven B Heymsfield Journal: Obes Res Date: 2003-01
Authors: Jacqueline Bauer; John Thornton; Steven Heymsfield; Kim Kelly; Alexander Ramirez; Sonia Gidwani; Dympna Gallagher Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Reza Hosseini Ghomi; Bijoy J Thomas; Martin Torriani; Danielle J Brick; Anu V Gerweck; Madhusmita Misra; Anne Klibanski; Karen K Miller Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-01-28 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Rebecca Scherzer; Wei Shen; Peter Bacchetti; Donald Kotler; Cora E Lewis; Michael G Shlipak; Mark Punyanitya; Steven B Heymsfield; Carl Grunfeld Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Corey M Gill; Leigh K Keating; Martin Torriani; Ellen J Anderson; Mark Punyanitya; Kevin E Wilson; Thomas L Kelly; Karen K Miller Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 5.002