PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the risk and outcome of reconstruction of the extracranial vertebral artery (ECVA). METHOD: The study was conducted as a retrospective review of 369 consecutive ECVA reconstructions. RESULTS: The clinical presentations consisted of hemispheric symptoms alone in 4% of the cases, hemispheric and vertebrobasilar symptoms in 30%, and vertebrobasilar symptoms alone in 60%. The cause of the lesion was atherosclerosis (n = 300), extrinsic compression (n = 42), dissection (n = 7), radiation arteritis (n = 5), intimal hyperplasia (n = 3), fibromuscular dysplasia (n = 2), previous surgical ligation (n = 3), aneurysm (n = 2), and other (n = 5). All the patients underwent preoperative arteriography. There were 252 proximal ECVA reconstructions (218 transpositions, 42 bypass grafting procedures, and two other) and 117 distal ECVA reconstructions (85 bypass grafting procedures, 25 transpositions, and seven other). In 83 patients, the ECVA operation was performed concomitant with a carotid or supraaortic trunk reconstruction. This series was analyzed in two separate sets: before 1991 (n = 215), when changes in indications and management were occurring; and after 1991 (n = 154), when we acquired a dedicated anesthesia team and digital arteriography in the operating room and established uniform protocols for the management of ECVA disease. The stroke, death, and stroke/death rates for the period before 1991 were, respectively, 4. 1%, 3.2% and 5.1%. The stroke, death, and stroke/death rates for the period after 1991 were, respectively, 1.9%, 0.6% and 1.9%. The patency rate at 5 years was 80%. The survival rate at 5 years was 70%. Most of the deaths during the follow-up period were caused by cardiac disease. Among the survivors, the protection rate from stroke was 97%. CONCLUSION: The changes in operative selection and management have improved the results of ECVA reconstruction. The data reported for ECVA reconstruction in patients who underwent operation since 1991 reflect the outcome of ECVA reconstruction today. In our experience, a reconstruction of the ECVA is less risky than a carotid reconstruction.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify the risk and outcome of reconstruction of the extracranial vertebral artery (ECVA). METHOD: The study was conducted as a retrospective review of 369 consecutive ECVA reconstructions. RESULTS: The clinical presentations consisted of hemispheric symptoms alone in 4% of the cases, hemispheric and vertebrobasilar symptoms in 30%, and vertebrobasilar symptoms alone in 60%. The cause of the lesion was atherosclerosis (n = 300), extrinsic compression (n = 42), dissection (n = 7), radiation arteritis (n = 5), intimal hyperplasia (n = 3), fibromuscular dysplasia (n = 2), previous surgical ligation (n = 3), aneurysm (n = 2), and other (n = 5). All the patients underwent preoperative arteriography. There were 252 proximal ECVA reconstructions (218 transpositions, 42 bypass grafting procedures, and two other) and 117 distal ECVA reconstructions (85 bypass grafting procedures, 25 transpositions, and seven other). In 83 patients, the ECVA operation was performed concomitant with a carotid or supraaortic trunk reconstruction. This series was analyzed in two separate sets: before 1991 (n = 215), when changes in indications and management were occurring; and after 1991 (n = 154), when we acquired a dedicated anesthesia team and digital arteriography in the operating room and established uniform protocols for the management of ECVA disease. The stroke, death, and stroke/death rates for the period before 1991 were, respectively, 4. 1%, 3.2% and 5.1%. The stroke, death, and stroke/death rates for the period after 1991 were, respectively, 1.9%, 0.6% and 1.9%. The patency rate at 5 years was 80%. The survival rate at 5 years was 70%. Most of the deaths during the follow-up period were caused by cardiac disease. Among the survivors, the protection rate from stroke was 97%. CONCLUSION: The changes in operative selection and management have improved the results of ECVA reconstruction. The data reported for ECVA reconstruction in patients who underwent operation since 1991 reflect the outcome of ECVA reconstruction today. In our experience, a reconstruction of the ECVA is less risky than a carotid reconstruction.
Authors: Alexander V. Khaw; H. Christian Schumacher; Philip M. Meyers; Rishi Gupta; Randall T. Higashida Journal: Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med Date: 2004-06
Authors: Carina W Yang; James C Carr; Stephen F Futterer; Mark D Morasch; Benson P Yang; Stephanie M Shors; J Paul Finn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ran Xu; Xiao Zhang; Sihua Liu; Xue Wang; Wenjiao Wang; Kun Yang; Tao Wang; Adam A Dmytriw; Xuesong Bai; Yan Ma; Liqun Jiao; Bin Yang Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-05-17