Literature DB >> 10642015

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of geriatricians regarding patients with dementia who are potentially dangerous automobile drivers: a national survey.

G Cable1, M Reisner, S Gerges, V Thirumavalavan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine geriatrician knowledge regarding how to prevent a patient with dementia who is a potentially dangerous driver from driving and to determine their willingness to recommend license revocation against the wishes of both the patient and the patient's family. Included is a comparison of responses from geriatricians in California, where related legislation has existed for a decade, with responses from geriatricians from all other US states combined.
DESIGN: Survey sample.
SETTING: Geriatric practices. PARTICIPANTS: Probability sample of 467 geriatricians. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey responses.
RESULTS: More than 28% of all geriatricians (95% CI, 24.3%-32.7%) do not know how to report patients with dementia who are potentially dangerous drivers. A 22% difference (95% CI, 13.9%-30.8%) exists between California geriatricians and those in all other US states. More than 75% (95%, CI, 71.5%-79.5%) of all geriatricians agreed that physicians are responsible for reporting patients. More than 86% (95% CI, 83.2%-89.6%) of all geriatricians would contact state authorities despite the objections of the patient, and 72.9% (95% CI, 68.7%-77.1%) would contact authorities despite the objections of the patient's family.
CONCLUSIONS: Although most geriatricians will act to protect the public from patients with dementia who are potentially dangerous drivers, many do not know how to report these drivers. Legislation can improve a physician's ability to report patients with dementia who are potentially dangerous drivers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10642015     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03022.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  7 in total

1.  Mandatory Physician Reporting of At-Risk Drivers: The Older Driver Example.

Authors:  Yll Agimi; Steven M Albert; Ada O Youk; Patricia I Documet; Claudia A Steiner
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2018-05-08

2.  Perspectives on Tiered Older Driver Assessment in Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Marian E Betz; Jacqueline Jones; Emma Genco; David B Carr; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Jason S Haukoos; Steven R Lowenstein; Robert Schwartz
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2014-05-02

3.  Discretionary medical reporting of potentially unfit drivers: a questionnaire-based survey in southeast Switzerland.

Authors:  Sebastian Eggert; Michael J Thali; Matthias Pfäffli
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  The American Medical Association Older Driver Curriculum for health professionals: changes in trainee confidence, attitudes, and practice behavior.

Authors:  Thomas M Meuser; David B Carr; Cheryl Irmiter; Joanne G Schwartzberg; Gudmundur F Ulfarsson
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Educ       Date:  2010

5.  Family physicians' attitudes and practices regarding assessments of medical fitness to drive in older persons.

Authors:  Raymond W Jang; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Frank J Molnar; David B Hogan; Shawn C Marshall; Julie Auger; Ian D Graham; Nicol Korner-Bitensky; George Tomlinson; Matthew E Kowgier; Gary Naglie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Barriers to assessing fitness to drive in dementia in nova scotia: informing strategies for knowledge translation.

Authors:  Paige Moorhouse; Laura Hamilton; Tracey Fisher; Kenneth Rockwood
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2011-11-11

7.  Determining fitness to drive in older persons: a survey of medical and surgical specialists.

Authors:  Shawn Marshall; Erin M Demmings; Andrew Woolnough; Danish Salim; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing
Journal:  Can Geriatr J       Date:  2012-12-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.