Literature DB >> 10641692

Intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of cervical spine measurements.

C C Wellborn1, P F Sturm, R S Hatch, S R Bomze, K Jablonski.   

Abstract

Lateral flexion-extension radiographs of 72 patients with Down syndrome were used to assess the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the atlanto-dens interval, Wiesel-Rothman measurement, occiput atlas angle, and Power's ratio in flexion and extension. The radiographs were reviewed by three blinded observers on three different occasions with at least a 1-month interval between assessments. The intraclass correlation coefficient was used to measure the reproducibility of the measurements from a given observer and the reliability between different observers. With the exception of observer one, the atlanto-dens interval had a statistically significant intraobserver agreement compared with any of the other measurements (p < 0.05). The atlanto-dens interval and the Wiesel-Rothman measurements tended to have better correlation between observers, although there was only fair agreement. The agreement, however, was statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared with Power's ratio. The degree of intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability may make it difficult to base treatment protocols on these measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  8 in total

1.  Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of powers ratio for assessment of atlanto-occipital junction: comparison of plain radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Gang Li; Peter Passias; Michal Kozanek; Brian D Shannon; Guoan Li; Fernando Villamil; Christopher M Bono; Mitchel Harris; Kirkham B Wood
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Imaging the craniocervical junction.

Authors:  Wendy R K Smoker; Geetika Khanna
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Assessment of adjacent-segment mobility after cervical disc replacement versus fusion: RCT with 1 year's results.

Authors:  A Nabhan; B Ishak; W I Steudel; S Ramadhan; O Steimer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Development and first application testing of a new protocol for CT-based stability evaluation of the injured upper cervical spine.

Authors:  Matthias K Jung; Lukas Hörnig; Michael M A Stübs; Paul A Grützner; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Motion and dural sac compression in the upper cervical spine during the application of a cervical collar in case of unstable craniocervical junction-A study in two new cadaveric trauma models.

Authors:  Shiyao Liao; Niko R E Schneider; Petra Hüttlin; Paul A Grützner; Frank Weilbacher; Stefan Matschke; Erik Popp; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Inter-examiner reliability of radiographic measurements from Open-mouth lateral bending cervical radiographs.

Authors:  Karthik V Hariharan; Lauren Terhorst; Matthew D Maxwell; Christopher G Bise; Michael G Timko; Michael J Schneider
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-05-26

7.  Musculoskeletal anomalies in children with Down syndrome: an observational study.

Authors:  Charlene Foley; Orla G Killeen
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Determination of cutoff values on computed tomography and magnetic resonance images for the diagnosis of atlantoaxial instability in small-breed dogs.

Authors:  Bastien Planchamp; Franck Forterre; Beatriz Vidondo; Angel M Hernandez-Guerra; Ioannis N Plessas; Martin J Schmidt; Maja A Waschk; Christina Precht
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 1.618

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.