Literature DB >> 10641672

Sperm whale clicks: directionality and source level revisited.

B Møhl1, M Wahlberg, P T Madsen, L A Miller, A Surlykke.   

Abstract

In sperm whales (Physeter catodon L. 1758) the nose is vastly hypertrophied, accounting for about one-third of the length or weight of an adult male. Norris and Harvey [in Animal Orientation and Navigation, NASA SP-262 (1972), pp. 397-417] ascribed a sound-generating function to this organ complex. A sound generator weighing upward of 10 tons and with a cross-section of 1 m is expected to generate high-intensity, directional sounds. This prediction from the Norris and Harvey theory is not supported by published data for sperm whale clicks (source levels of 180 dB re 1 microPa and little, if any, directionality). Either the theory is not borne out or the data is not representative for the capabilities of the sound-generating mechanism. To increase the amount of relevant data, a five-hydrophone array, suspended from three platforms separated by 1 km and linked by radio, was deployed at the slope of the continental shelf off Andenes, Norway, in the summers of 1997 and 1998. With this system, source levels up to 223 dB re 1 microPa peRMS were recorded. Also, source level differences of 35 dB for the same click at different directions were seen, which are interpreted as evidence for high directionality. This implicates sonar as a possible function of the clicks. Thus, previously published properties of sperm whale clicks underestimate the capabilities of the sound generator and therefore cannot falsify the Norris and Harvey theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641672     DOI: 10.1121/1.428329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  The sonar beam pattern of a flying bat as it tracks tethered insects.

Authors:  Kaushik Ghose; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sperm whale behaviour indicates the use of echolocation click buzzes "creaks" in prey capture.

Authors:  Patrick J O Miller; Mark P Johnson; Peter L Tyack
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Diversity in sound pressure levels and estimated active space of resident killer whale vocalizations.

Authors:  Patrick J O Miller
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  The echolocation transmission beam of free-ranging Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins (Sousa chinensis).

Authors:  Liang Fang; Yuping Wu; Kexiong Wang; Matthew K Pine; Ding Wang; Songhai Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Echolocation in Blainville's beaked whales (Mesoplodon densirostris).

Authors:  P T Madsen; N Aguilar de Soto; P Arranz; M Johnson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  The Source Parameters of Echolocation Clicks from Captive and Free-Ranging Yangtze Finless Porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis).

Authors:  Liang Fang; Ding Wang; Yongtao Li; Zhaolong Cheng; Matthew K Pine; Kexiong Wang; Songhai Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Echolocating bats emit a highly directional sonar sound beam in the field.

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Simon Boel Pedersen; Lasse Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Clicking in shallow rivers: short-range echolocation of Irrawaddy and Ganges River dolphins in a shallow, acoustically complex habitat.

Authors:  Frants H Jensen; Alice Rocco; Rubaiyat M Mansur; Brian D Smith; Vincent M Janik; Peter T Madsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A simulation study of acoustic-assisted tracking of whales for mark-recapture surveys.

Authors:  David Peel; Brian S Miller; Natalie Kelly; Steve Dawson; Elisabeth Slooten; Michael C Double
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Architecture of the sperm whale forehead facilitates ramming combat.

Authors:  Olga Panagiotopoulou; Panagiotis Spyridis; Hyab Mehari Abraha; David R Carrier; Todd C Pataky
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.