Literature DB >> 10641317

The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: tests of an interference model.

M I Isaak1, K L Shapiro, J Martin.   

Abstract

When people respond to a target (T1) in a rapid serial visual presentation stream, their perception of a subsequent target (T2) is impaired if the intertarget stimulus onset asynchrony is between about 100 and 500 ms. Three experiments supported the interference model's (K. L. Shapiro, J. E. Raymond, & K. M. Arnell, 1994) claim that this attentional blink reflects competition for retrieval among multiple items in visual short-term memory. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that items appearing during the blink are named as T2 on an above-chance proportion of trials when T2 must be identified. Experiment 3 demonstrated that both the size of the blink and sensitivity to T2 reflected the number of items competing for retrieval as T2; such competition, moreover, occurred at a conceptual or categorical level rather than at a purely visual one. The relationship between the interference and alternative models of the attentional blink is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10641317     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.25.6.1774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation to right parietal cortex modifies the attentional blink.

Authors:  Adam C G Cooper; Glyn W Humphreys; Johan Hulleman; Peter Praamstra; Mark Georgeson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Short-term memory and the attentional blink: capacity versus content.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

3.  Phonological encoding in the attentional blink paradigm.

Authors:  Veronika Coltheart; Lisa S Yen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

4.  Attentional blinks as errors in temporal binding.

Authors:  Ariella V Popple; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  When similarity leads to sparing: probing mechanisms underlying the attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Corinne Davis; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-08-12

6.  Working memory capacity, intelligence, and the magnitude of the attentional blink revisited.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Addie Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Top-down control is not lost in the attentional blink: evidence from intact endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Liping Shao; Mark Nieuwenstein; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Differential effects of exogenous and endogenous cueing in multi-stream RSVP: implications for theories of attentional blink.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Liping Shao; Xiaolin Zhou; Sander Martens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.