| Literature DB >> 10640946 |
Abstract
A fundamental assumption made by skeletal biologists is that both the pattern and rate of age-related morphological changes observed in modern reference populations are not significantly different than in past populations. In this brief exploration, the composition of a single reference and two independent, known-age, target samples are evaluated for the pubic symphysis. Differences in the timing of age-progressive changes between the reference and target samples are observed, and in particular, females demonstrated a pattern that was fundamentally different from the reference sample. These results serve as a cautionary note for the use of osteological aging criteria and issues of representativeness for modern standards. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10640946 DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200002)111:2<185::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO;2-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Phys Anthropol ISSN: 0002-9483 Impact factor: 2.868