Literature DB >> 10640810

ULS: a versatile method of labeling nucleic acids for FISH based on a monofunctional reaction of cisplatin derivatives with guanine moieties.

J C Wiegant1, R P van Gijlswijk, R J Heetebrij, V Bezrookove, A K Raap, H J Tanke.   

Abstract

The broad extension of an existing chemical DNA labeling technique for molecular cytogenetics is described. Called the Universal Linkage System (ULS(TM)), it is based on the capability of monoreactive cisplatin derivatives to react at the N7 position of guanine moieties in DNA. Simple repetitive probes, cosmids, PACs, and chromosome-specific painting probes were labeled by ULS and used in a series of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization experiments on interphase and metaphase cells. It is demonstrated that ULS-labeled probes, in general, perform as well as the more conventional enzymatically labeled probes. The advantage of ULS labeling over enzymatic labeling techniques is that it is a fast and simple procedure, and that the labeling can easily be scaled up for bulk probe synthesis. In addition, with ULS labeling it is possible to label degraded DNA, a situation in which enzymatic labeling is known to perform unsatisfactorily. Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10640810     DOI: 10.1159/000015390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  8 in total

1.  A rapid method for manual or automated purification of fluorescently labeled nucleic acids for sequencing, genotyping, and microarrays.

Authors:  Amy L Springer; Lisa R Booth; Michael D Braid; Christiane M Houde; Karin A Hughes; Robert J Kaiser; Casandra Pedrak; Douglas A Spicer; Sergey Stolyar
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2003-03

2.  Probing microRNAs with microarrays: tissue specificity and functional inference.

Authors:  Tomas Babak; Wen Zhang; Quaid Morris; Benjamin J Blencowe; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 3.  Sizing up the future of microRNA analysis.

Authors:  Abraham J Qavi; Jared T Kindt; Ryan C Bailey
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Comparative genomic hybridization: DNA labeling, hybridization and detection.

Authors:  Richard Redon; Tomas Fitzgerald; Nigel P Carter
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

5.  A versatile genome-scale PCR-based pipeline for high-definition DNA FISH.

Authors:  Magda Bienko; Nicola Crosetto; Leonid Teytelman; Sandy Klemm; Shalev Itzkovitz; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Prediction and verification of mouse tRNA gene families.

Authors:  Daniel J Coughlin; Tomas Babak; Chad Nihranz; Timothy R Hughes; David R Engelke
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.652

7.  A systematic search for new mammalian noncoding RNAs indicates little conserved intergenic transcription.

Authors:  Tomas Babak; Benjamin J Blencowe; Timothy R Hughes
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Evaluation of MetriGenix custom 4D arrays applied for detection of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Aslaug Aamodt Muggerud; Hilde Johnsen; Debra A Barnes; Adam Steel; Per Eystein Lønning; Bjørn Naume; Therese Sørlie; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.