Literature DB >> 106397

Isolation and analysis of chemosensory behavior mutants in Drosophila melanogaster.

L Tompkins, M J Cardosa, F V White, T G Sanders.   

Abstract

A behavioral countercurrent paradigm has been developed for assaying the chemotactic responses of wild-type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster adults. Oregon R males avoid both quinine sulfate and NaCl, whereas Oregon R females reject the quinine salt but are attracted to NaCl when tested in this paradigm. Wild-type behavior is sufficiently reproducible to allow identification of mutants affecting chemotaxis, and 12 such mutants, in six complementation groups, have now been isolated. Three of the mutants respond abnormally to NaCl, two in one complementation group with atactic behavior (no chemotaxis) and the other, in a separate group, with a mistactic response (attraction to the stimulus). Four mutants in another group respond mistactically to quinine sulfate. Of the remaining mutants, two in one group behave atactically and three, in two groups, respond mistactically to either chemical stimulus. Several of the mutants also show abnormal behavior in a proboscis extension assay when tested individually with sucrose solutions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 106397      PMCID: PMC383081          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  14 in total

1.  The developmental effect of a sex-limited gene in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S T CHAN FUNG; J W GOWEN
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1957-04

2.  Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. XIV. A selection of immobile adults.

Authors:  T A Grigliatti; L Hall; R Rosenbluth; D T Suzuki
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1973-01-24

3.  Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D T Suzuki
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-11-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Temperature-sensitive mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. V. A mutation affecting concentrations of pteridines.

Authors:  T Grigliatti; D T Suzuki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genetic dissection of the Drosophila nervous system by means of mosaics.

Authors:  Y Hotta; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mutation affecting taste perception in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R Falk; J Atidia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Clock mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R J Konopka; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Conditioned behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W G Quinn; W A Harris; S Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Electrical activity in the chemoreceptors of the blowfly. I. Responses to chemical and mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  M L WOLBARSHT; V G DETHIER
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1958-11-20       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Stimulation of a primary taste receptor by salts.

Authors:  D R EVANS; D MELLON
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  12 in total

1.  Closely linked lesions in a region of the X chromosome affect central and peripheral steps in gustatory processing in Drosophila.

Authors:  V Rodrigues; S Sathe; L Pinto; R Balakrishnan; O Siddiqi
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1991-04

2.  The genetic variant Voila causes gustatory defects during Drosophila development.

Authors:  M Balakireva; N Gendre; R F Stocker; J F Ferveur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Isolation and characterization of feeding behavior mutants in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N Fujishiro; H Kijima; Y Miyakawa
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Ethanol preference in Drosophila melanogaster is driven by its caloric value.

Authors:  Jascha B Pohl; Brett A Baldwin; Boingoc L Dinh; Pinkey Rahman; Dustin Smerek; Francisco J Prado; Nyssa Sherazee; Nigel S Atkinson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Monitoring food preference in Drosophila by oligonucleotide tagging.

Authors:  Annie Park; Tracy Tran; Nigel S Atkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Molecular and cellular designs of insect taste receptor system.

Authors:  Kunio Isono; Hiromi Morita
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.505

7.  Behavioral and biochemical defects in temperature-sensitive acetylcholinesterase mutants of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J C Hall; S N Alahiotis; D A Strumpf; K White
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A gustatory mutant of Drosophila defective in pyranose receptors.

Authors:  V Rodrigues; O Siddiqi
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1981

9.  An odorant-binding protein required for suppression of sweet taste by bitter chemicals.

Authors:  Yong Taek Jeong; Jaewon Shim; So Ra Oh; Hong In Yoon; Chul Hoon Kim; Seok Jun Moon; Craig Montell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  malvolio, the Drosophila homologue of mouse NRAMP-1 (Bcg), is expressed in macrophages and in the nervous system and is required for normal taste behaviour.

Authors:  V Rodrigues; P Y Cheah; K Ray; W Chia
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.