OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and cost of physical therapy (PT) or occupational therapy (OT) in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial, with 1 year follow-up. SETTING:Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five patients who had been suffering from RSD of one upper extremity for less than 1 year. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to PT, OT, or a control group (social work). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in impairment level sumscore (ISS) over 1 year (Student's t test). A difference of 5 ISS points between the groups was defined as being clinically relevant. Furthermore, severity of disability and handicap was measured and tested exploratively (Wilcoxon; alpha = .05), and cost-effectiveness of the groups was calculated. RESULTS: PT and, to a lesser extent, OT resulted in a significant and also more rapid improvement in the ISS as compared with controls (6 and 4 ISS points, respectively). On a disability level, a positive trend was found in favor of OT. On a handicap level, no differences were found between the groups. PT had an advantage over OT regarding the cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSION: In different ways PT and OT each contribute to the recovery from RSD of the upper extremity.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and cost of physical therapy (PT) or occupational therapy (OT) in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial, with 1 year follow-up. SETTING: Two university hospitals. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-five patients who had been suffering from RSD of one upper extremity for less than 1 year. INTERVENTIONS:Patients were assigned to PT, OT, or a control group (social work). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in impairment level sumscore (ISS) over 1 year (Student's t test). A difference of 5 ISS points between the groups was defined as being clinically relevant. Furthermore, severity of disability and handicap was measured and tested exploratively (Wilcoxon; alpha = .05), and cost-effectiveness of the groups was calculated. RESULTS: PT and, to a lesser extent, OT resulted in a significant and also more rapid improvement in the ISS as compared with controls (6 and 4 ISS points, respectively). On a disability level, a positive trend was found in favor of OT. On a handicap level, no differences were found between the groups. PT had an advantage over OT regarding the cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSION: In different ways PT and OT each contribute to the recovery from RSD of the upper extremity.
Authors: Roberto S Perez; Paul E Zollinger; Pieter U Dijkstra; Ilona L Thomassen-Hilgersom; Wouter W Zuurmond; Kitty Cj Rosenbrand; Jan H Geertzen Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Hiske E M van Dieten; Roberto S G M Perez; Maurits W van Tulder; Jaap J de Lange; Wouter W A Zuurmond; Herman J Ader; Hindrik Vondeling; Maarten Boers Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2003 Impact factor: 4.981