Literature DB >> 10638846

Investigations of the proximity effect for pollutants in the indoor environment.

S J McBride1, A R Ferro, W R Ott, P Switzer, L M Hildemann.   

Abstract

More than a dozen indoor air quality studies have reported a large discrepancy between concentrations measured by stationary indoor monitors (SIMs) and personal exposure monitors (PEMs). One possible cause of this discrepancy is a source proximity effect, in which pollutant sources close to the respondent cause elevated and highly variable exposures. This paper describes three sets of experiments in a home using real-time measurements to characterize and quantify the proximity effect relative to a fixed distant location analogous to a SIM. In the first set of experiments, using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) as a continuously emitting tracer pollutant from a point source, measurements of pollutant concentrations were made at different distances from the source under different air exchange rates and source strengths. A second set of experiments used a continuous point source of carbon monoxide (CO) tracer pollutant and an array of high time resolution monitors to collect simultaneous concentration readings at different locations in the room. A third set of experiments measured particle count density and particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) concentrations emitted from a continuous particle point source (an incense stick) using two particle counters and two PAH monitors, and included human activity periods both before and during the source emission period. Results from the SF6 and CO experiments show that while the source is emitting, a source proximity effect can be seen in the increases in the mean and median and in the variability of concentrations closest to the source, even at a distance of 2.0 m from the source under certain settings of air exchange rate and source strength. CO concentrations at locations near the source were found to be higher and more variable than the predictions of the mass balance model. For particles emitted from the incense source, a source proximity effect was evident for the fine particle sizes (0.3 to 2.5 microm) and particle-bound PAH up to at least 1.0 m from the source. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns in the data for the three tracer pollutants reveal marked transient elevations of concentrations as seen by the monitor, referred to as "microplumes," particularly at locations close to the source. Mixing patterns in the room show complex patterns and directional effects, as evidenced by the variable intensity of the microplume activity at different locations. By characterizing the spatial and temporal variability of pollutant concentrations in the home, the proximity effect can be quantified, leading to improved indoor monitoring designs and models of human exposure to air pollutants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10638846     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  9 in total

Review 1.  Flying the smoky skies: secondhand smoke exposure of flight attendants.

Authors:  J Repace
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Stochastic modeling of short-term exposure close to an air pollution source in a naturally ventilated room: an autocorrelated random walk method.

Authors:  Kai-Chung Cheng; Viviana Acevedo-Bolton; Ruo-Ting Jiang; Neil E Klepeis; Wayne R Ott; Peter K Kitanidis; Lynn M Hildemann
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Estimation of chronic personal exposure to airborne polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

Authors:  Hyunok Choi; Michael Zdeb; Frederica Perera; John Spengler
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Preparation and performance features of wristband samplers and considerations for chemical exposure assessment.

Authors:  Kim A Anderson; Gary L Points; Carey E Donald; Holly M Dixon; Richard P Scott; Glenn Wilson; Lane G Tidwell; Peter D Hoffman; Julie B Herbstman; Steven G O'Connell
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 5.  Environmental monitoring of secondhand smoke exposure.

Authors:  Benjamin J Apelberg; Lisa M Hepp; Erika Avila-Tang; Lara Gundel; S Katharine Hammond; Melbourne F Hovell; Andrew Hyland; Neil E Klepeis; Camille C Madsen; Ana Navas-Acien; James Repace; Jonathan M Samet; Patrick N Breysse
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Association of FEV1 in asthmatic children with personal and microenvironmental exposure to airborne particulate matter.

Authors:  Ralph J Delfino; Penelope J E Quintana; Josh Floro; Victor M Gastañaga; Behzad S Samimi; Michael T Kleinman; L-J Sally Liu; Charles Bufalino; Chang-Fu Wu; Christine E McLaren
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Pollutant exposures from natural gas cooking burners: a simulation-based assessment for Southern California.

Authors:  Jennifer M Logue; Neil E Klepeis; Agnes B Lobscheid; Brett C Singer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Histological changes in the lung of Wistar albino rats (Rattus norvegicus) after exposure to Arabian incense (genus Boswellia).

Authors:  Majed S Alokail; Saud A Alarifi
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

9.  Classroom aerosol dispersion: desk spacing and divider impacts.

Authors:  P Dacunto; D Moser; A Ng; M Benson
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.860

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.