Literature DB >> 10638641

Gender differences in the reinforcing properties of morphine.

T J Cicero1, T Ennis, J Ogden, E R Meyer.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present studies was to examine whether gender differences could be observed in an important aspect of morphine's pharmacology: its reinforcing properties. Our results showed that morphine served as a positive reinforcing agent in both male and female rats in a place conditioning paradigm, but that the dose-response curves displayed marked sex-related differences. At doses from 0.2 up to 10.0 mg/kg, morphine induced an equally strong preference for the drug-associated chamber in males and females. However, as the dose was increased from 10-17.5 mg/kg, morphine ceased to act as a positive reinforcer in males. In contrast, a very strong preference for the morphine-associated chamber was still observed in females at doses up to 30 mg/kg. No gender differences in the blood and brain levels of morphine were observed subsequent to morphine administration during the conditioning phase, suggesting that pharmacokinetic factors were not involved in the sex-related differences observed. Consequently, these results suggest that there are intrinsic sex-linked differences in the doses of morphine that can induce a preference for the drug-associated chamber in a place-conditioning paradigm that are most likely related to differences in the sensitivity of the central nervous system to morphine's reinforcing properties in males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10638641     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(99)00174-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  30 in total

Review 1.  Sex Differences in Animal Models: Focus on Addiction.

Authors:  Jill B Becker; George F Koob
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 25.468

2.  Factors associated with the transition from abuse to dependence among substance abusers: implications for a measure of addictive liability.

Authors:  Ty A Ridenour; Mildred Maldonado-Molina; Wilson M Compton; Edward L Spitznagel; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  PAG mu opioid receptor activation underlies sex differences in morphine antinociception.

Authors:  Scott A Bernal; Michael M Morgan; Rebecca M Craft
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Periadolescent male but not female rats have higher motor activity in response to morphine than do adult rats.

Authors:  David A White; Clifford C Michaels; Stephen G Holtzman
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Sex differences in locomotor effects of morphine in the rat.

Authors:  Rebecca M Craft; James L Clark; Stephen P Hart; Megan K Pinckney
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Repeated Morphine Produces Sensitization to Reward and Tolerance to Antiallodynia in Male and Female Rats with Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy.

Authors:  L P Legakis; S S Negus
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  The role of the neuropeptide PEN receptor, GPR83, in the reward pathway: Relationship to sex-differences.

Authors:  Amanda K Fakira; Emily G Peck; Yutong Liu; Lindsay M Lueptow; Nikita A Trimbake; Ming-Hu Han; Erin S Calipari; Lakshmi A Devi
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  Can coadministration of oxycodone and morphine produce analgesic synergy in humans? An experimental cold pain study.

Authors:  Michael Grach; Wattan Massalha; Dorit Pud; Rivka Adler; Elon Eisenberg
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Visualizing acute pain-morphine interaction in descending monoamine nuclei with Fos.

Authors:  Dusica Bajic; Kathryn G Commons
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  mu-opioid receptor-mediated antinociceptive responses differ in men and women.

Authors:  Jon-Kar Zubieta; Yolanda R Smith; Joshua A Bueller; Yanjun Xu; Michael R Kilbourn; Douglas M Jewett; Charles R Meyer; Robert A Koeppe; Christian S Stohler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.