Literature DB >> 10638537

Measuring post-decision satisfaction.

F Sainfort1, B C Booske.   

Abstract

Measuring satisfaction with a decision after a choice has been made is particularly important for difficult choice situations where there is no "right" decision and/or where long-term consequences are uncertain. While others have developed instruments that primarily focus on clinical decisions, the authors developed a scale-the decision-attitude scale-in the context of consumers' choice of health plan. They examined the reliability and validity of this scale using data from a sample of state employees. While the decision-attitude scale has been applied to a health-plan-choice problem only, it can be applied to a variety of other health-related decision problems, because it shares a core set of items with the existing Satisfaction with Decision Scale. The authors identify and discuss the similarities and differences between the two scales. They also observe that each scale uncovers an additional construct not addressed by the other, suggesting that the concept of post-decision satisfaction is multidimensional. A new instrument combining items from both scales may prove the best measure of decision satisfaction for a variety of health-related decision problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10638537     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0002000107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  18 in total

1.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?

Authors:  Rob Eisinga; Manfred te Grotenhuis; Ben Pelzer
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Does positivity operate when the stakes are high? Health status and decision making among older adults.

Authors:  Tammy English; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-04-20

4.  Returning individual research results: development of a cancer genetics education and risk communication protocol.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; David I Shalowitz; Kurt D Christensen; Jessica N Everett; Scott Y H Kim; Leon Raskin; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Consumers' views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to 'shared decision-making' approaches.

Authors:  A Edwards; G Elwyn; C Smith; S Williams; H Thornton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Judy M Simpson; Alexandra Barratt; Don Nutbeam; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-26

Review 7.  Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions.

Authors:  Edward Duncan; Catherine Best; Suzanne Hagen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

8.  Preliminary validation of the Satisfaction With Decision scale with depressed primary care patients.

Authors:  Celia E Wills; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Assessing Children's Responses to Interparental Conflict: Validation and Short Scale Development of SIS and CPIC-Properties Scales.

Authors:  Tonje Holt; Maren Sand Helland; Kristin Gustavson; Edward Mark Cummings; Anh Ha; Espen Røysamb
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2020-02

10.  Financial incentives for increasing uptake of HPV vaccinations: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Eleni Mantzari; Florian Vogt; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 4.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.