Literature DB >> 10638440

Cutaneomotor integration in humans is somatotopically organized at various levels of the nervous system and is task dependent.

J Classen1, B Steinfelder, J Liepert, K Stefan, P Celnik, L G Cohen, A Hess, E Kunesch, R Chen, R Benecke, M Hallett.   

Abstract

Integration of tactile afferent signals with motor commands is crucial for the performance of purposeful movements such as during manipulation of an object in the hand. To study the somatotopic organization of sensorimotor integration we applied electrical peripheral conditioning stimuli to a digit located near (homotopic stimulation) or distant from (heterotopic stimulation) relaxed or isometrically contracted intrinsic hand muscles at variable time intervals prior to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Cutaneous stimulation has previously been shown to modulate the amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) and to shorten the duration of the silent period (SP) evoked by TMS. In relaxed target muscles the time-dependent modulation of TMS-evoked motor responses by homotopic conditioning stimulation differed from modulation by heterotopic stimulation. Similar differences in the modulation pattern evoked by homotopic and heterotopic conditioning stimulation were observed for two distinct target muscles of the hand (abductor digiti minimi, abductor pollicis brevis muscle). Differences in modulation were maximal when the conditioning stimulation was applied 25-30 ms and 150-200 ms prior to TMS. Comparison of the modulation of the amplitudes of MEPs evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and the modulation of those evoked by TMS suggests that differences between homotopic and heterotopic stimulation originate subcortically at 25- to 30-ms and, at least partially, cortically at 150- to 200-ms interstimulus intervals. In isometrically contracted intrinsic hand muscles the degree to which the SP was shortened reflected the location and the timing of the conditioning stimulus. Shortening was maximal when the conditioning stimulus was applied nearest to the contracted target muscle and 20 ms prior to the test stimulus. In contrast to the SP duration, the MEP size in voluntarily contracted target muscles was unaffected by the location of the conditioning stimulus. The somatotopic gradient of SP shortening was abolished when the two target muscles were simultaneously activated isometrically. Together, our findings suggest that somatotopy of input-output relationships is implemented at both a spinal and a cortical level in the human central nervous system and may also depend on the motor task involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10638440     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  47 in total

1.  Modulation of intracortical neuronal circuits in human hand motor area by digit stimulation.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Jane Ng; Hugo Théoret; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of peripheral sensory input on cortical inhibition in humans.

Authors:  Alexandra Sailer; Gregory F Molnar; Danny I Cunic; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Differential effect of muscle vibration on intracortical inhibitory circuits in humans.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Karin Rosenkranz; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Neurophysiology of dystonia: The role of inhibition.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.996

6.  Anodal Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum Reduces Cerebellar Brain Inhibition but Does Not Influence Afferent Input from the Hand or Face in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Sebastian H Doeltgen; Jessica Young; Lynley V Bradnam
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.847

7.  Trigeminal nerve stimulation modulates brainstem more than cortical excitability in healthy humans.

Authors:  B Mercante; G Pilurzi; F Ginatempo; A Manca; P Follesa; E Tolu; F Deriu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Defective cerebellar control of cortical plasticity in writer's cramp.

Authors:  Cecile Hubsch; Emmanuel Roze; Traian Popa; Margherita Russo; Ammu Balachandran; Salini Pradeep; Florian Mueller; Vanessa Brochard; Angelo Quartarone; Bertrand Degos; Marie Vidailhet; Asha Kishore; Sabine Meunier
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  The influence of sensory afferent input on local motor cortical excitatory circuitry in humans.

Authors:  Robin F H Cash; Reina Isayama; Carolyn A Gunraj; Zhen Ni; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Treatment and physiology in Parkinson's disease and dystonia: using transcranial magnetic stimulation to uncover the mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Aparna Wagle Shukla; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.