Literature DB >> 10636519

Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: a randomized comparison of one or two sutures on each side of the urethra.

J Persson1, P Wølner-Hanssen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare 1-year cure rates after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension using one double-bite or two single-bite sutures on each side of the urethra.
METHODS: Consecutive women with primary stress urinary incontinence at one university hospital were included. Preoperative clinical and urodynamic evaluation included cystoscopy, cystouretrometry at rest and stress, and a standardized pad test. Immediately before surgery, the patients were randomized to have one or two polytetrafluoroethylene (GoreTex CV 2; W. L. Gore Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) sutures placed on each side of the urethra. During surgery, access to the space of Retzius was achieved by transperitoneal videolaparoscopic technique. Women were scheduled for postoperative interview and pad test 1 year after surgery.
RESULTS: We included 161 women in the study; 78 were randomized to one suture (group A) and 83 to two sutures (group B). Median time for surgery was significantly shorter for group A than for group B (60 compared with 77 minutes; P < .001). We examined 158 women 1 year after surgery, at which time 148 performed a pad test. Objective cure rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (83% compared with 58%; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Two single-bite sutures resulted in a significantly higher objective short-term cure rate than one double-bite suture on each side of the urethra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10636519     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00529-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Management of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cornella
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

2.  Midline intravaginal slingplasty for treatment of urinary stress incontinence: results of an independent audit up to 2 years after surgery.

Authors:  Marga M Ijland; Dagmar-C Fischer; Dirk G Kieback; Greg McGrath; Bruce Farnsworth
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-03-02

3.  Preoperative urethral parameters at rest and objective cure following laparoscopic colposuspension.

Authors:  Maria Andrada Hamer; Jan Persson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Burch colposuspension.

Authors:  Nikolaus Veit-Rubin; Jean Dubuisson; Abigail Ford; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Sherif Mourad; Alex Digesu
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 2.696

5.  Multiple Endoclip Retraction Technique (MERT) in Laparoscopic Burch.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Fatih Demir; Gokhan Sonmez; Murat Keske
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

6.  Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Jeong Hee Hong; Myung-Soo Choo; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Jawad Freites; Fiona Stewart; Muhammad Imran Omar; Atefeh Mashayekhi; Wael I Agur
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.