OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the positive parathyroid sestamibi scan, if correctly interpreted and applied, truly represents a parathyroid adenoma, never a "false-positive" scan. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the sestamibi scan is widely ordered preoperatively to locate parathyroid adenomas, concern about a false-positive scan often causes surgeons to distrust the results. Tissues such as thyroid adenomas and lymph nodes have been blamed for false-positive studies, but the radioactivity of these presumed false-positive tissues has never been measured. METHODS: Over an 1 8-month period, 17 patients were referred for persistent primary hyperparathyroidism after undergoing at least one neck exploration. All patients had a sestamibi scan prior to their initial operation that was interpreted as clearly positive and then, during or after an unsuccessful operation, deemed false-positive by the surgeon. At the authors' institution, all patients underwent repeat sestamibi scintigraphy and were taken to the operating room while radioactive for a minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy (MIRP). RESULTS: The authors' sestamibi scans demonstrated the same single focus of radioactivity displayed on the outside scans, clearly positive. During MIRP, an adenoma was successfully located and removed in all patients, with confirmation of the diagnosis by quantitative differential radioactivity and subsequent histologic examination. Removal of the radioactive tissue cured all patients. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative nuclear mapping permitted identification and removal of parathyroid adenomas in all patients with positive sestamibi scans that had previously been labelled false-positive, indicating that each patient would have been cured during their previous operation if radioguided techniques were used. Surgeons should be extremely cautious in deciding intraoperatively that a positive sestamibi scan is a false-positive scan.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that the positive parathyroid sestamibi scan, if correctly interpreted and applied, truly represents a parathyroid adenoma, never a "false-positive" scan. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the sestamibi scan is widely ordered preoperatively to locate parathyroid adenomas, concern about a false-positive scan often causes surgeons to distrust the results. Tissues such as thyroid adenomas and lymph nodes have been blamed for false-positive studies, but the radioactivity of these presumed false-positive tissues has never been measured. METHODS: Over an 1 8-month period, 17 patients were referred for persistent primary hyperparathyroidism after undergoing at least one neck exploration. All patients had a sestamibi scan prior to their initial operation that was interpreted as clearly positive and then, during or after an unsuccessful operation, deemed false-positive by the surgeon. At the authors' institution, all patients underwent repeat sestamibi scintigraphy and were taken to the operating room while radioactive for a minimally invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy (MIRP). RESULTS: The authors' sestamibi scans demonstrated the same single focus of radioactivity displayed on the outside scans, clearly positive. During MIRP, an adenoma was successfully located and removed in all patients, with confirmation of the diagnosis by quantitative differential radioactivity and subsequent histologic examination. Removal of the radioactive tissue cured all patients. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative nuclear mapping permitted identification and removal of parathyroid adenomas in all patients with positive sestamibi scans that had previously been labelled false-positive, indicating that each patient would have been cured during their previous operation if radioguided techniques were used. Surgeons should be extremely cautious in deciding intraoperatively that a positive sestamibi scan is a false-positive scan.
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754