Literature DB >> 10633894

Periprosthetic humeral fractures: management and classification.

R L Worland1, D Y Kim, J Arredondo.   

Abstract

Six patients (67 to 94 years of age) sustained a periprosthetic humeral fracture at an average of 43 months after shoulder arthroplasty (range 13 to 85 months). These fractures were classified depending on fracture anatomy and implant stability. Type A fractures occur about the tuberosities. Type B fractures occur about the stem and are subclassified by fracture anatomy and implant stability: B1 fractures are spiral fractures with a stable implant, B2 fractures are transverse or short oblique fractures about the tip of the stem with a stable implant, and B3 fractures are those fractures about the stem with an unstable implant. Type C fractures occur well distal to the tip of the stem. Five of the 6 fractures required surgery, 4 with revision to a long-stemmed component. All fractures united with restoration of range of motion and function. Satisfactory results may be anticipated if these fractures are managed in an appropriate fashion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10633894     DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90095-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  30 in total

Review 1.  Shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Bernhard Jost; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Rehabilitation after periprosthetic fractures].

Authors:  M Schmitt-Sody; C Valle
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Strategies and techniques for osteosynthesis].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; U Brunner; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Classification of periprosthetic shoulder fractures].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; S Kirchhoff; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  [Periprosthetic fractures. An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  R Stange; M J Raschke; T Fuchs
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement: a thirty-three-year study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Cathy Schleck; William Harmsen; Robert Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Comminuted periprosthetic humeral fracture after reverse shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Renato Sommacal; Hans Rudolph Bloch; Adriana Ghidelli; Graziano Bettelli; Paolo Dalla Pria
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04

8.  Inadvertent, intraoperative, non- to minimally displaced periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures in RTSA do not affect the clinical and radiographic short-term outcome.

Authors:  Anita Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Caroline Passaplan; Karl Wieser
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Distal humeral plating of an intramedullary nail periprosthetic fracture using a miss-a-nail technique: a case report.

Authors:  Khaled M Sarraf; Ravi Singh; Steven A Corbett
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-05-29

Review 10.  Fractures in bone tumour prosthesis.

Authors:  Andrea Piccioli; Barbara Rossi; Federico Maria Sacchetti; Maria Silvia Spinelli; Alberto Di Martino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.