Literature DB >> 10633882

Protein recovery from several paper types used to collect gingival crevicular fluid.

R B Johnson1, C F Streckfus, X Dai, M A Tucci.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of protein elution from several types of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) collection papers when the volume of the inoculated protein and the elution methods were constant. Various concentrations of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 14C-BSA were placed onto strips of Whatman #1 [W1], Whatman 3 MM chromatographic [W3], Periopaper (ProFlow) [P] and Periopaper (Harco) [H], and recovered proteins measured following a non-optimized centrifugal elution technique. There were significant differences in % recovery of BSA and 14C-BSA from the papers, which was dependent on both the type of paper and the concentration of the inoculated protein; that is, proteins at the lowest concentrations were less efficiently eluted from GCF collection papers than those at higher concentrations. Equations for regression lines of elution efficiency were quadratic. Thus, our data suggest significant differences in the efficiency for elution of BSA from absorbent papers when the volume of the inoculated fluid and the elution technique were constant. Previous variable or conflicting experimental data between research groups may have resulted from incomplete elution of proteins from GCF collection papers, possibly due to entrapment within, or binding of GCF proteins to the paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10633882     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1999.tb02255.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Res        ISSN: 0022-3484            Impact factor:   4.419


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of gingival crevicular fluid sampling methods in patients with severe chronic periodontitis.

Authors:  Arndt Guentsch; Martin Kramesberger; Aneta Sroka; Wolfgang Pfister; Jan Potempa; Sigrun Eick
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Analysis of Biomarkers and Marginal Bone Loss in Platform-Switched and Nonplatform-Switched Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Necla Asli Kocak-Oztug; Gamze Zeynep Adem-Siyli; Orkhan Abishev; Sule Batu; Yegane Guven; Ali Cekici; Aslan Y Gokbuget; Erhan Firatli; Serdar Cintan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Evaluating the potential of a novel oral lesion exudate collection method coupled with mass spectrometry-based proteomics for oral cancer biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Joel A Kooren; Nelson L Rhodus; Chuanning Tang; Pratik D Jagtap; Bryan J Horrigan; Timothy J Griffin
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.988

Review 4.  A critical analysis of research methods to study clinical molecular biomarkers in Endodontic research.

Authors:  Matthias Zehnder; Georgios N Belibasakis
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  EMD in periodontal regenerative surgery modulates cytokine profiles: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Oscar Villa; Johan C Wohlfahrt; Odd Carsten Koldsland; Steven J Brookes; Staale P Lyngstadaas; Anne M Aass; Janne E Reseland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.