Literature DB >> 10633175

DNA damage and repair: consequences on dose-responses.

E Moustacchi1.   

Abstract

Damage to DNA is considered to be the main initiating event by which genotoxins cause hereditary effects and cancer. Single or double strand breaks, bases modifications or deletions, intra- or interstrand DNA-DNA or DNA-protein cross-links constitute the major lesions formed in different proportions according to agents and to DNA sequence context. They can result in cell death or in mutational events which in turn may initiate malignant transformation. Normal cells are able to repair these lesions with fidelity or by introducing errors. Base excision (BER) and nucleotide excision (NER) repair are error-free processes acting on the simpler forms of DNA damage. A specialized form of BER involves the removal of mismatched DNA bases occurring as errors of DNA replication or from miscoding properties of damaged bases. Severe damage will be repaired according to several types of recombinational processes: homologous, illegitimate and site-specific recombination pathways. The loss of repair capacity as seen in a number of human genetic diseases and mutant cell lines leads to hypersensitivity to environmental agents. Repair-defective cells show qualitative (mutation spectrum) and quantitative alterations in dose-effect relationships. For such repair-deficient systems, direct measurements at low doses are possible and the extrapolation from large to low doses fits well with the linear or the linear-quadratic no-threshold models. Extensive debate still takes place as to the shape of the dose-response relationships in the region at which genetic effects are not directly detectable in repair-proficient normal cells. Comparison of repair mutants and wild-type organisms pragmatically suggests that, for many genotoxins and tissues, very low doses may have no effect at all in normal cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10633175     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(99)00164-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  10 in total

1.  Transcription profile of DNA damage response genes at G₀ lymphocytes exposed to gamma radiation.

Authors:  Divyalakshmi Saini; Shridevi Shelke; A Mani Vannan; Sneh Toprani; Vinay Jain; Birajalaxmi Das; M Seshadri
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  DNA repair capacity in lymphocytes of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.

Authors:  Norbert H Kleinsasser; Barbara C Wallner; Christiane Wagner; Ernst R Kastenbauer; Ulrich A Harréus
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Genetic and epigenetic features in radiation sensitivity Part I: cell signalling in radiation response.

Authors:  Michel H Bourguignon; Pablo A Gisone; Maria R Perez; Severino Michelin; Diana Dubner; Marina Di Giorgio; Edgardo D Carosella
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  DNA MMR systems, microsatellite instability and antioxidant activity variations in two species of wild bats: Myotis velifer and Desmodus rotundus, as possible factors associated with longevity.

Authors:  Juan C Conde-Pérezprina; Armando Luna-López; Viridiana Y González-Puertos; Tania Zenteno-Savín; Miguel Angel León-Galván; Mina Königsberg
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-03-28

5.  Miniaturized flow cytometric in vitro micronucleus assay represents an efficient tool for comprehensively characterizing genotoxicity dose-response relationships.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Cigarette smoke-induced DNA damage and repair detected by the comet assay in HPV-transformed cervical cells.

Authors:  Afsoon Moktar; Srivani Ravoori; Manicka V Vadhanam; C Gary Gairola; Ramesh C Gupta
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.650

7.  Metformin (dimethyl-biguanide) induced DNA damage in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Rubem R Amador; João Paulo Figueiró Longo; Zulmira G Lacava; José G Dórea; Maria de Fátima M Almeida Santos
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 1.771

8.  Alternation between toxic and proliferative effects of Roundup® on human thyroid cells at different concentrations.

Authors:  Izabela Fernanda Dal' Bó; Elisângela Souza Teixeira; Larissa Teodoro Rabi; Karina Colombera Peres; Matheus Nascimento; Maria Izabel Chiamolera; Valdemar Máximo; Natássia Elena Bufalo; Laura Sterian Ward
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.055

9.  Sex ratio among offspring of childhood cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

Authors:  J F Winther; J D Boice; B L Thomsen; W J Schull; M Stovall; J H Olsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  DNA mismatch repair system: repercussions in cellular homeostasis and relationship with aging.

Authors:  Juan Cristóbal Conde-Pérezprina; Miguel Ángel León-Galván; Mina Konigsberg
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 6.543

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.