Literature DB >> 10633148

Endosonography of the anal canal and rectum.

A Kumar1, J H Scholefield.   

Abstract

Endosonography has evolved into an effective tool for the accurate preoperative assessment of anorectal pathology, from idiopathic anal pain to malignancy. The published data suggest that endosonography is currently the best method for assessing the structural integrity of the anal sphincter and for staging rectal cancer. The development of new treatment modalities for rectal cancer, including local excision, preoperative radiotherapy, and total mesorectal excision, has increased the importance of accurate preoperative staging to allow the optimum treatment planning. However, there is little information about the impact of endosonographic findings on clinical decision making. Education, training, and quality control in the use of endosonography also require further work. This article aims to evaluate the usefulness and limitations of this technique in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10633148     DOI: 10.1007/s002689910034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  8 in total

Review 1.  Updated recommendations on ultrasonography in urogynecology.

Authors:  R Tunn; G Schaer; U Peschers; W Bader; A Gauruder; E Hanzal; H Koelbl; D Koelle; D Perucchini; E Petri; P Riss; B Schuessler; V Viereck
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-10-16

2.  Comparison of accuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography for preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronic anal fistula.

Authors:  T Toyonaga; Y Tanaka; J F Song; R Katori; N Sogawa; H Kanyama; T Hatakeyama; M Matsushima; S Suzuki; R Mibu; M Tanaka
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Microbiological analysis and endoanal ultrasonography for diagnosis of anal fistula in acute anorectal sepsis.

Authors:  Takayuki Toyonaga; Makoto Matsushima; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Yasuhiro Shimojima; Naomi Matsumura; Hiroki Kannyama; Makiko Nozawa; Tomoaki Hatakeyama; Kazunori Suzuki; Kenzo Yanagita; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Tumour regression grading in the evaluation of tumour response after different preoperative radiotherapy treatments for rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J Vironen; M Juhola; M Kairaluoma; I Jantunen; I Kellokumpu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Endorectal ultrasonography versus phased-array magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ahmet-Mesrur Halefoglu; Sadik Yildirim; Omer Avlanmis; Damlanur Sakiz; Adil Baykan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Clinical review: surgical management of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Courtney; F McDermott; A Heeney; D C Winter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  The accuracy of multi-detector row computerized tomography in staging rectal cancer compared to endoscopic ultrasound.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Aljebreen; Nahla A Azzam; Ahmad M Alzubaidi; Mohamed S Alsharqawi; Thamer A Altraiki; Othman R Alharbi; Majid A Almadi
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.485

8.  The Optimal Application of Transrectal Ultrasound in Staging of Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Pragmatic Study for Accuracy Investigation.

Authors:  Yufeng Ren; Jinning Ye; Yan Wang; Weixin Xiong; Jianbo Xu; Yulong He; Shirong Cai; Min Tan; Yujie Yuan
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 4.207

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.