Literature DB >> 10633009

Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic wound healing: a meta-analysis.

S E Gardner1, R A Frantz, F L Schmidt.   

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to quantify the effect of electrical stimulation on chronic wound healing. Fifteen studies, which included 24 electrical stimulation samples and 15 control samples, were analyzed. The average rate of healing per week was calculated for the electrical stimulation and control samples. Ninety-five percentage confidence intervals were also calculated. The samples were then grouped by type of electrical stimulation device and chronic wound and reanalyzed. Rate of healing per week was 22% for electrical stimulation samples and 9% for control samples. The net effect of electrical stimulation was 13% per week, an increase of 144% over the control rate. The 95% confidence intervals of the electrical stimulation (18-26%) and control samples (3.8-14%) did not overlap. Electrical stimulation was most effective on pressure ulcers (net effect = 13%). Findings regarding the relative effectiveness of different types of electrical stimulation device were inconclusive. Although electrical stimulation produces a substantial improvement in the healing of chronic wounds, further research is needed to identify which electrical stimulation devices are most effective and which wounds respond best to this treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10633009     DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00495.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  29 in total

1.  Biochemical and Biophysical Cues in Matrix Design for Chronic and Diabetic Wound Treatment.

Authors:  Yun Xiao; Samad Ahadian; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Electrical stimulation for difficult wounds: only an alternative procedure?

Authors:  Marco Fraccalvieri; Marco Salomone; Enrico M Zingarelli; Filippo Rivarossa; Stefano Bruschi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Electrical Stimulation of Wound Healing: A Review of Animal Experimental Evidence.

Authors:  Giti Torkaman
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  The analgesic effect of electrostimulation (WoundEL®) in the treatment of leg ulcers.

Authors:  Pauline Leloup; Pascal Toussaint; Jean-Paul Lembelembe; Philippe Célérier; Hervé Maillard
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  [Physical treatment modalities for chronic leg ulcers].

Authors:  J Dissemond
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 6.  Electrical stimulation therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Deena Lala; Sandi J Spaulding; Shauna M Burke; Pamela E Houghton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-07-01

Review 8.  Nanomaterials and synergistic low-intensity direct current (LIDC) stimulation technology for orthopedic implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Rohan A Shirwaiker; Meghan E Samberg; Paul H Cohen; Richard A Wysk; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-01-17

Review 9.  Wound coverage technologies in burn care: novel techniques.

Authors:  Marc G Jeschke; Celeste C Finnerty; Shahriar Shahrokhi; Ludwik K Branski; Manuel Dibildox
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 10.  A review of gene and stem cell therapy in cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  Ludwik K Branski; Gerd G Gauglitz; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 2.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.