Literature DB >> 10632839

A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region.

Y Sato1, N Shindoi, R Hosokawa, K Tsuga, Y Akagawa.   

Abstract

To prevent loosening or fracture of screws retaining the prosthesis to the implants in the posterior partially edentulous region, the use of staggered buccal and lingual offset placement or wide implants is suggested. However, it is not known how this usage compensates for the torque produced by lateral occlusal forces. This study evaluated the effectiveness of offset placement of three implants and a wide implant placement at the most posterior site. Three-dimensional geometric analysis was used to calculate the tensile force applied to gold screws in clinical situations with buccal or lingual loading perpendicular to cuspal inclination (10 or 20 degrees ). Four variations of the placement of three implants (3.75 mm) are: (1) straight; (2) buccal offset of the second implant; (3) lingual offset of the second implant; (4) a wide implant (5 mm) placement at most posterior site. The offset placement did not always decrease tensile force at the gold screw, but wide implant placement and decrease in cuspal inclination did.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10632839     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00475.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Rehabil        ISSN: 0305-182X            Impact factor:   3.837


  8 in total

1.  A Simple and Cost Effective Method used for Removal of a Fractured Implant Abutment Screw: A Case Report.

Authors:  Parth Satwalekar; K Subash Chander; B Anantha Reddy; N Sandeep; N Sandeep; Tanushree Satwalekar
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-10-26

2.  A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model.

Authors:  Miyuki Omori; Yuji Sato; Noboru Kitagawa; Yuta Shimura; Manabu Ito
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-04-28

3.  Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible.

Authors:  Yuta Shimura; Yuji Sato; Noboru Kitagawa; Miyuki Omori
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-06-17

4.  Stress distribution pattern of screw-retained restorations with segmented vs. non-segmented abutments: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shima Aalaei; Zahra Rajabi Naraki; Fatemeh Nematollahi; Elaheh Beyabanaki; Afsaneh Shahrokhi Rad
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2017-09-20

5.  Correlation between abutment angulation and off-axial stresses on biomechanical behavior of titanium and zirconium implants in the anterior maxilla: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study.

Authors:  Harilal Guguloth; Chalapathi Rao Duggineni; Ravi Kumar Chitturi; M Sujesh; T Ravvali; Roja Roshan Amiti
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2019-10-10

6.  Finite Element Analysis of Dental Implants with Zirconia Crown Restorations: Conventional Cement-Retained vs. Cementless Screw-Retained.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Lee; Ho Yeol Jang; Su Young Lee
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Noninvasive method for retrieval of broken dental implant abutment screw.

Authors:  Jagadish Reddy Gooty; Sunil Kumar Palakuru; Vikram Reddy Guntakalla; Mahipal Nera
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-04

8.  Retrospective clinical study of ultrawide implants more than 6 mm in diameter.

Authors:  Jeong-Kui Ku; Yang-Jin Yi; Pil-Young Yun; Young-Kyun Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.