Literature DB >> 10632352

Genetic alterations in ERBB2-amplified breast carcinomas.

J Isola1, L Chu, S DeVries, K Matsumura, K Chew, B M Ljung, F M Waldman.   

Abstract

Amplification of the ERBB2 oncogene has recently received attention as a target for antibody-based therapies and as a predictor of response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Modification of treatment strategies based on ERBB2 status has led to further interest in the genetic alterations that accompany ERBB2 gene amplification or overexpression. In this study, chromosome alterations that are associated with ERBB2 amplification were defined by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Additionally, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used to validate gene amplification, and protein expression was detected immunohistochemically. ERBB2-amplified tumors as detected by FISH, immunohistochemistry (IHC), or CGH had twice as many CGH-defined chromosomal alterations (means of 11.8, 11.0, and 12.7, respectively) as the nonamplified tumors (means of 6.8, 7.0, and 5.6, respectively). ERBB2 positivity correlated with the total number of genetic events. A wide spectrum of copy number gains and losses was seen by CGH in all of the tumors. An increased number of losses of 18q and gains of 20q was found in ERBB2-positive tumors. Other common aberrations for all of the tumors were copy number gains of 1q (58%), 8q (52%), 20q (30%), and losses of 18q (39%), 13q (39%), and 3p (33%). A high degree of concordance was observed among the three methods in 33 primary breast cancers. The concurrence for ERBB2 detection between FISH and IHC was 90%, between FISH and CGH was 82%, and between IHC and CGH was 84%. This study shows that breast tumors showing erbB2 overexpression or gene amplification are genetically distinct from erbB2-negative tumors. These differences may relate to the mechanisms underlying altered response to adjuvant therapies and may define the responsiveness to erbB2-directed immunotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10632352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  14 in total

1.  Integrating data on DNA copy number with gene expression levels and drug sensitivities in the NCI-60 cell line panel.

Authors:  Kimberly J Bussey; Koei Chin; Samir Lababidi; Mark Reimers; William C Reinhold; Wen-Lin Kuo; Fuad Gwadry; Hosein Kouros-Mehr; Jane Fridlyand; Ajay Jain; Colin Collins; Satoshi Nishizuka; Giovanni Tonon; Anna Roschke; Kristen Gehlhaus; Ilan Kirsch; Dominic A Scudiero; Joe W Gray; John N Weinstein
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Absence of CCND1 gene amplification in breast tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  S A Vaziri; R R Tubbs; G Darlington; G Casey
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2001-08

Review 3.  The oncogene HER2: its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  M M Moasser
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  c-myc amplifications in primary breast carcinomas and their local recurrences.

Authors:  S Aulmann; N Adler; J Rom; B Helmchen; P Schirmacher; H P Sinn
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  A human breast cell model of preinvasive to invasive transition.

Authors:  Aylin Rizki; Valerie M Weaver; Sun-Young Lee; Gabriela I Rozenberg; Koei Chin; Connie A Myers; Jamie L Bascom; Joni D Mott; Jeremy R Semeiks; Leslie R Grate; I Saira Mian; Alexander D Borowsky; Roy A Jensen; Michael O Idowu; Fanqing Chen; David J Chen; Ole W Petersen; Joe W Gray; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Increased copy number at 3p14 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid Ljuslinder; Beatrice Malmer; Irina Golovleva; Marcus Thomasson; Kjell Grankvist; Thomas Höckenström; Stefan Emdin; Yvonne Jonsson; Håkan Hedman; Roger Henriksson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Correlation of breast cancer risk factors with HER-2/neu protein overexpression according to menopausal and estrogen receptor status.

Authors:  Nikos Tsakountakis; Elias Sanidas; Efstathios Stathopoulos; Maria Kafousi; Nektaria Anogiannaki; Vasilis Georgoulias; Dimitris D Tsiftsis
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2005-02-04       Impact factor: 2.809

8.  Amplification of HER2 is a marker for global genomic instability.

Authors:  Rachel E Ellsworth; Darrell L Ellsworth; Heather L Patney; Brenda Deyarmin; Brad Love; Jeffrey A Hooke; Craig D Shriver
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Correlation of amplification and overexpression of the c-myc oncogene in high-grade breast cancer: FISH, in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemical analyses.

Authors:  J Blancato; B Singh; A Liu; D J Liao; R B Dickson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Deciphering a subgroup of breast carcinomas with putative progression of grade during carcinogenesis revealed by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) and immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  E Korsching; J Packeisen; M W Helms; C Kersting; R Voss; P J van Diest; B Brandt; E van der Wall; W Boecker; H Bürger
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-04-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.