BACKGROUND: Genetic factors play a role or roles in the etiology of peptic ulcer disease and the acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative importance of genetic and environmental influences as well as the importance of H. pylori on peptic ulcer disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study on monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, reared apart or together. PARTICIPANTS: Twins of the subregistry of the Swedish Twin Registry included in the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging. MEASUREMENTS: Peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori status were assessed in MZ and DZ twin pairs reared apart or together. A total of 258 twin pairs had information regarding H. pylori status and history of peptic ulcer. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed as the presence of anti-H. pylori IgG. RESULTS: The intraclass correlations for peptic ulcer disease for MZ twins reared apart and together and DZ twins reared apart and together were 0.67, 0.65, 0.22, and 0.35, respectively, which indicates that genetic effects are important for liability to peptic ulcer. The correlation coefficient for MZ twins reared apart (0.67) provides the best single estimate of the relative importance of genetic effects (heritability) for variation in liability to peptic ulcer disease, and structural model fitting analyses confirmed this result (heritability, 62%). The cross-twin cross-trait correlations for MZ and DZ twins were examined to determine whether genetic effects for peptic ulcer were shared with or independent of genetic influences for H. pylori. The cross-correlations for MZ and DZ twins were almost identical (0.25 and 0.29, respectively), suggesting that familial environmental rather than genetic influences mediate the association between peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic influences are of moderate importance for liability to peptic ulcer disease. Genetic influences for peptic ulcer are independent of genetic influences important for acquiring H. pylori infection.
BACKGROUND: Genetic factors play a role or roles in the etiology of peptic ulcer disease and the acquisition of Helicobacter pylori infection. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative importance of genetic and environmental influences as well as the importance of H. pylori on peptic ulcer disease. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study on monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins, reared apart or together. PARTICIPANTS: Twins of the subregistry of the Swedish Twin Registry included in the Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging. MEASUREMENTS: Peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori status were assessed in MZ and DZ twin pairs reared apart or together. A total of 258 twin pairs had information regarding H. pylori status and history of peptic ulcer. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed as the presence of anti-H. pylori IgG. RESULTS: The intraclass correlations for peptic ulcer disease for MZ twins reared apart and together and DZ twins reared apart and together were 0.67, 0.65, 0.22, and 0.35, respectively, which indicates that genetic effects are important for liability to peptic ulcer. The correlation coefficient for MZ twins reared apart (0.67) provides the best single estimate of the relative importance of genetic effects (heritability) for variation in liability to peptic ulcer disease, and structural model fitting analyses confirmed this result (heritability, 62%). The cross-twin cross-trait correlations for MZ and DZ twins were examined to determine whether genetic effects for peptic ulcer were shared with or independent of genetic influences for H. pylori. The cross-correlations for MZ and DZ twins were almost identical (0.25 and 0.29, respectively), suggesting that familial environmental rather than genetic influences mediate the association between peptic ulcer disease and H. pyloriinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic influences are of moderate importance for liability to peptic ulcer disease. Genetic influences for peptic ulcer are independent of genetic influences important for acquiring H. pyloriinfection.
Authors: Mark W Logue; Sarah R Bauver; William S Kremen; Carol E Franz; Seth A Eisen; Ming T Tsuang; Michael D Grant; Michael J Lyons Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Yeda Wu; Graham K Murray; Enda M Byrne; Julia Sidorenko; Peter M Visscher; Naomi R Wray Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Ramiro Vilchez-Vargas; Jurgita Skieceviciene; Konrad Lehr; Greta Varkalaite; Cosima Thon; Mindaugas Urba; Egidijus Morkūnas; Laimutis Kucinskas; Karolina Bauraite; Denny Schanze; Martin Zenker; Peter Malfertheiner; Juozas Kupcinskas; Alexander Link Journal: EBioMedicine Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stella Smith; Tolu Jolaiya; Muinah Fowora; Pia Palamides; Favour Ngoka; Moses Bamidele; Olufunmilayo Lesi; Charles Onyekwere; Rose Ugiagbe; Ifeanyi Agbo; Dennis Ndububa; Olusegun Adekanle; Abimbola Adedeji; Isaac Adeleye; Ute Harrison Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Date: 2018-07-27