Literature DB >> 10631356

Utilization of cholecystectomy-a prospective outcome analysis in 1325 patients.

L W Traverso1, R Lonborg, K Pettingell, L F Fenster.   

Abstract

The advent of laparoscopic techniques has resulted in an increased incidence of cholecystectomy, creating a need to reevaluate utilization. The new outcomes research movement emphasizes patient-derived data as well as traditional clinical outcomes. One of the purposes of this prospective study was to seek possible correlations between a variety of variables, both patient- and physician-derived, to the patient's degree of overall satisfaction with the outcome. From July 1992 to May 1997, five different data collection forms were prospectively implemented-three physician-derived (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) and two patient-derived sets of data. In the postoperative patient instrument, patients were asked to rate their degree of satisfaction with the outcome of their surgery on a scale of 1 to 5, with 5 being "extremely satisfied" and 1 being "not at all satisfied." We then sought differences between those patients rating their satisfaction as 5 vs. those rating their satisfaction as 1 to 3. Age, sex, and the presence of comorbid conditions did not correlate with eventual satisfaction. The following were correlated with a statistically significant better degree of satisfaction: the preoperative presence of known gallstones or a preoperative physician-derived history of typical biliary pain. No preoperative patient-derived data were associated with satisfaction; however, the postoperative presence of abdominal pain predicted dissatisfaction. Not surprisingly, continued problems with abdominal pain strongly correlated with dissatisfaction, but this finding supports the accuracy of our assessment instrument. Furthermore, the more typical and clear-cut the clinical presentation, the greater the patient satisfaction with the outcome of cholecystectomy. Satisfaction and pain relief are strongly associated. In patients with pain preoperatively, measurement of either pain relief or satisfaction may be adequate to assess correct utilization of this operative procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10631356     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80026-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  8 in total

1.  Surgery as placebo. A quantitative study of bias.

Authors:  H K BEECHER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1961-07-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Internal-mammary-artery ligation for angina pectoris; its failure to produce relief.

Authors:  R G FISH; T P CRYMES; M G LOVELL
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1958-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Cholecystectomy provides long-term symptom relief in patients with acalculous gallbladders.

Authors:  T M Gilliland; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  K P Koo; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Shattuck lecture--outcomes management. A technology of patient experience.

Authors:  P M Ellwood
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-06-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical manifestations and impact of gallstone disease.

Authors:  L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Modern standards for comparison of cholecystectomy with alternative treatments for symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long-term relief of symptoms.

Authors:  T M Gilliland; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1990-01

Review 8.  What symptoms does cholecystectomy cure? Insights from an outcomes measurement project and review of the literature.

Authors:  L F Fenster; R Lonborg; R C Thirlby; L W Traverso
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.565

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes. What are they and why should they be measured?

Authors:  L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Persistent and de novo symptoms after cholecystectomy: a systematic review of cholecystectomy effectiveness.

Authors:  Mark P Lamberts; Marjolein Lugtenberg; Maroeska M Rovers; Anne J Roukema; Joost P H Drenth; Gert P Westert; Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Rate of elective cholecystectomy and the incidence of severe gallstone disease.

Authors:  David R Urbach; Thérèse A Stukel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry.

Authors:  V Velanovich; J M Morton; M McDonald; R Orlando; G Maupin; L W Traverso
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Contributing factors to postoperative length of stay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Srinivas J Ivatury; Christopher L Louden; Wayne H Schwesinger
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.