STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the way in which nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy influences the relative humidity (rH) of inspired air; and (2) to assess the impact on rH of the addition of an integrated heated humidifier or a full face mask to the CPAP circuitry. DESIGN: The studies were performed in 25 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome receiving long-term nasal CPAP therapy and complaining of nasal discomfort. During CPAP administration, temperature and rH were measured in the mask either during a night's sleep for 8 patients or during a daytime study in which the effects of mouth leaks were simulated in 17 patients fitted with either a nasal mask (with or without humidification) or a face mask alone. SETTING: University hospital sleep disorders center. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compared with the values obtained with CPAP alone, integrated heated humidification significantly increased rH during the sleep recording, both when the mouth was closed (60 +/- 14% to 81 +/- 14%, p < 0.01) and during mouth leaks (43 +/- 12% to 64 +/- 8%, p < 0.01). During the daytime study, a significant decrease in rH was observed with CPAP alone. Compared with the values measured during spontaneous breathing without CPAP (80 +/- 2%), the mean rH was 63 +/- 9% (p < 0.01) with the mouth closed and 39 +/- 9% (p < 0. 01) with the mouth open. The addition of heated humidification to CPAP prevented rH changes when the mouth was closed (82 +/- 12%), but did not fully prevent the rH decrease during simulation of mouth leaks (63 +/- 9%) compared with the control period (80 +/- 2%, p < 0. 01). Finally, attachment of a face mask to the CPAP circuitry prevented rH changes both with the mouth closed (82 +/- 9%) and with the mouth open (84 +/- 8%). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that inhaled air dryness during CPAP therapy can be significantly attenuated by heated humidification, even during mouth leaks, and can be totally prevented by using a face mask.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were (1) to evaluate the way in which nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy influences the relative humidity (rH) of inspired air; and (2) to assess the impact on rH of the addition of an integrated heated humidifier or a full face mask to the CPAP circuitry. DESIGN: The studies were performed in 25 patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome receiving long-term nasal CPAP therapy and complaining of nasal discomfort. During CPAP administration, temperature and rH were measured in the mask either during a night's sleep for 8 patients or during a daytime study in which the effects of mouth leaks were simulated in 17 patients fitted with either a nasal mask (with or without humidification) or a face mask alone. SETTING: University hospital sleep disorders center. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Compared with the values obtained with CPAP alone, integrated heated humidification significantly increased rH during the sleep recording, both when the mouth was closed (60 +/- 14% to 81 +/- 14%, p < 0.01) and during mouth leaks (43 +/- 12% to 64 +/- 8%, p < 0.01). During the daytime study, a significant decrease in rH was observed with CPAP alone. Compared with the values measured during spontaneous breathing without CPAP (80 +/- 2%), the mean rH was 63 +/- 9% (p < 0.01) with the mouth closed and 39 +/- 9% (p < 0. 01) with the mouth open. The addition of heated humidification to CPAP prevented rH changes when the mouth was closed (82 +/- 12%), but did not fully prevent the rH decrease during simulation of mouth leaks (63 +/- 9%) compared with the control period (80 +/- 2%, p < 0. 01). Finally, attachment of a face mask to the CPAP circuitry prevented rH changes both with the mouth closed (82 +/- 9%) and with the mouth open (84 +/- 8%). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that inhaled air dryness during CPAP therapy can be significantly attenuated by heated humidification, even during mouth leaks, and can be totally prevented by using a face mask.
Authors: Girolamo A Ortolano; Jeffrey Schaffer; Morven B McAlister; Ilia Stanchfield; Elizabeth Hill; Liliana Vandenburgh; Michelle Lewis; Shirnett John; Francis P Canonica; Joseph S Cervia Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Tim Leon Ullrich; Christoph Czernik; Christoph Bührer; Gerd Schmalisch; Hendrik Stefan Fischer Journal: World J Pediatr Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 2.764
Authors: Sharn Rowland; Vinod Aiyappan; Cathy Hennessy; Peter Catcheside; Ching Li Chai-Coezter; R Doug McEvoy; Nick A Antic Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 4.062