Literature DB >> 10631035

Determination of Water-Oil Interfacial Area during 3-Phase Gravity Drainage in Porous Media.

.   

Abstract

Water-oil interfacial area in porous media was determined in laboratory experiments using sand columns consisting of either 2 (water and oil) or 3 (water, oil, and air) fluid phases. Surfactant sorption at the water-oil interface was directly measured for a wide range of water, oil, and air saturations undergoing gravity drainage. Differing values of the water-oil interfacial tension were also examined. The Gibbs adsorption equation was then used to obtain values for the water-oil interfacial area. Both 2- and 3-phase water-oil experiments showed a linear increase in interfacial area with decreasing water saturation. Results also showed that interfacial areas were not affected by changes in interfacial tension. The interfacial areas in the 3-phase experiments were less than half the calculated values of the corresponding 2-phase experiments, which contradicts predictions from a conventional pore level analysis of 3-phase flow. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10631035     DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1999.6604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0021-9797            Impact factor:   8.128


  8 in total

1.  The two-phase flow IPTT method for measurement of nonwetting-wetting liquid interfacial areas at higher nonwetting saturations in natural porous media.

Authors:  Hua Zhong; Asma El Ouni; Dan Lin; Bingguo Wang; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-24       Impact factor: 5.240

2.  COMPARISON OF INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST AND HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROTOMOGRAPHY MEASUREMENTS OF FLUID-FLUID INTERFACIAL AREAS FOR AN IDEAL POROUS MEDIUM.

Authors:  Matt Narter; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.240

3.  NAPL-water interfacial area as a function of fluid saturation measured with the interfacial partitioning tracer test method.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; H Taghap
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Comparison of Fluid-Fluid Interfacial Areas Measured with X-ray Microtomography and Interfacial Partitioning Tracer Tests for the same Samples.

Authors:  Kieran McDonald; Kenneth C Carroll; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 5.240

5.  Interfacial partitioning tracer test measurements of organic-liquid/water interfacial areas: application to soils and the influence of surface roughness.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Matt Narter; Hilary Janousek
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  SYNCHROTRON X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY AND INTERFACIAL PARTITIONING TRACER TEST MEASUREMENTS OF NAPL-WATER INTERFACIAL AREAS.

Authors:  Mark L Brusseau; Hilary Janousek; Asami Murao; Gregory Schnaar
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.240

7.  Measurement and estimation of organic-liquid/water interfacial areas for several natural porous media.

Authors:  M L Brusseau; M Narter; G Schnaar; J Marble
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Contribution of Nonaqueous-Phase Liquids to the Retention and Transport of Per and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Porous Media.

Authors:  Sarah Van Glubt; Mark L Brusseau
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 9.028

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.