Literature DB >> 10629519

Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction.

S Haydar1, O Uner.   

Abstract

In this study, 20 patients were evaluated. Ten were treated with intraoral distalization followed by fixed appliance therapy, and 10 were treated with extra oral traction followed by fixed appliance therapy. Molar relationship correction was achieved in 2.5 months with intraoral distalization and in 10.7 months with extraoral distalization. A significant anterior movement of the anchorage unit (P <.001) was observed with the intraoral distalization and a significant distal drift of premolars was observed in the headgear group (P <.05). Palatal plane was found to tip downward significantly in the headgear group (P <.05). Total outcome of the 2 methods were discussed evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 distalization methods.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 10629519     DOI： 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70247-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN： 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.

Authors:  Mayara Paim Patel; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Roberto Henrique da Costa Grec
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

2.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Ali Alper Pampu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Fabrication and evaluation of a noncompliant molar distalizing appliance: bonded molar distalizer.

Authors:  A Sodagar; M S Ahmad Akhoundi; A Rafighii; S Arab
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-09-30

4.  Bilateral en-masse distalization of maxillary posterior teeth with skeletal anchorage: a case report.

Authors:  Saeed Noorollahian; Shiva Alavi; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

5.  Stress distribution in maxillary first molar periodontium using straight pull headgear with vertical and horizontal tubes: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Masood Feizbakhsh; Mahmoud Kadkhodaei; Dana Zandian; Zahra Hosseinpour
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr

6.  Comparison of dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusion treatment with Jones Jig appliance and with maxillary first premolar extractions.

Authors:  Daniela Cubas Pupulim; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Fernanda Pinelli Henriques; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019-05-20

7.  Dental, skeletal and soft tissue effects of the Distal Jet appliance: A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Rachelle Simões Reis; José F C Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Wilana Moura
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec

8.  A Comparison of Lower Dental Arch Changes Using Two Types of Space Regainers: A Removable Appliance with a Distalizing Screw and a Fixed Double-Banded Appliance.

Authors:  Shabnam Enteghad; Farzaneh Golfeshan; Ahmadreza Sardarian; Hooman Navaei
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-04-16

9.  Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmad Sharafeddin Burhan
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzani; Marco Pasini; Francesco Zallio; Robert Ritucci; Sabrina Mutinelli; Laura Mazzotta; Maria Rita Giuca; Vincenzo Piras
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-06-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.