Literature DB >> 10628542

An evaluation of the 'voice test' as a method for assessing hearing in children with particular reference to the situation in developing countries.

C A Prescott1, S S Omoding, J Fermor, D Ogilvy.   

Abstract

In developing countries with limited no or access to standard audiometric methods a 'voice test' is a potential non-technological alternative method of assessing hearing. A three level 'voice test' was developed, refined and standardised-accurate response to a whispered voice equating with normal hearing, to a conversational voice with mild hearing loss and to a loud voice to moderate/severe hearing loss. In a hospital based study 177 children were voice tested in sound treated rooms and then tested using standard audiometric procedures to determine precise hearing thresholds. In this situation the voice test had a specificity of 95.9% and a sensitivity of 80%. When the test was evaluated on 201 children aged 3-8 years, first voice tested and then tested with standard audiometry in the classrooms of their pre-primary schools it was found to have a specificity of 97.8% and a sensitivity of 83.3%. With this degree of accuracy in detecting hearing impairment and given the simplicity required to administer the test, it is felt that such a test could be recommended for use by primary health care workers in developing countries where access to standard audiometric methods for assessing hearing are not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10628542     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(99)00263-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  5 in total

Review 1.  Whispered voice test for screening for hearing impairment in adults and children: systematic review.

Authors:  Sandi Pirozzo; Tracey Papinczak; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-25

2.  The LonDownS adult cognitive assessment to study cognitive abilities and decline in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Carla M Startin; Sarah Hamburg; Rosalyn Hithersay; Amy Davies; Erin Rodger; Nidhi Aggarwal; Tamara Al-Janabi; André Strydom
Journal:  Wellcome Open Res       Date:  2016-11-15

3.  Comparison of personal sound amplification products and conventional hearing aids for patients with hearing loss: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chen; Chii-Yuan Huang; Hsiu-Lien Cheng; Heng-Yu Haley Lin; Yuan-Chia Chu; Chun-Yu Chang; Ying-Hui Lai; Mao-Che Wang; Yen-Fu Cheng
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  The effect of experience on the sensitivity and specificity of the whispered voice test: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  David McShefferty; William M Whitmer; Iain R C Swan; Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Screening for Hearing Impairment in Older Adults by Smartphone-Based Audiometry, Self-Perception, HHIE Screening Questionnaire, and Free-Field Voice Test: Comparative Evaluation of the Screening Accuracy With Standard Pure-Tone Audiometry.

Authors:  Lok Yee Joyce Li; Shin-Yi Wang; Cheng-Jung Wu; Cheng-Yu Tsai; Te-Fang Wu; Yaoh-Shiang Lin
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.