Literature DB >> 10628096

A model for change to evidence-based practice.

M A Rosswurm1, J H Larrabee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a model that guides nurses and other healthcare professionals through a systematic process for the change to evidence-based practice. The tremendous increases in clinical research and accessibility to research findings have prepared the way for the paradigm shift from traditional and intuition-driven practice to evidence-based practice. Although several models have emerged to guide practitioners in research utilization, practitioners continue to have difficulty synthesizing empirical and contextual evidence and integrating evidence-based changes into practice. ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK: The model is based on theoretical and research literature related to evidence-based practice, research utilization, standardized language, and change theory. In this model, practitioners are guided through the entire process of developing and integrating an evidence-based practice change. The model supports evidence-based practice changes derived from a combination of quantitative and qualitative data, clinical expertise, and contextual evidence.
METHODS: The model was developed using sources identified on searches of Medline, CINAHL, and systematic reviews available on the Internet. Review topics were focused on evidence-based medicine and nursing, research utilization, and change process. Other sources included clinical expertise and quality-improvement information.
CONCLUSIONS: Practitioners need skills and resources to appraise, synthesize, and diffuse the best evidence into practice. Patient outcomes must reflect discipline-specific and interdisciplinary accountabilities. Collaboration between researchers and practitioners within and among disciplines will enhance the diffusion of evidence-based practice innovations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10628096     DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00510.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Image J Nurs Sch        ISSN: 0743-5150


  15 in total

1.  Determinants of regional differences in sick leave duration for homogeneous groups in The Netherlands: their implications for social security policy-making.

Authors:  Willibrord Beemsterboer; Roy Stewart; Johan Groothoff; Frans Nijhuis
Journal:  Cent Eur J Public Health       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.163

Review 2.  A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: mapping the field.

Authors:  Sandra A Mitchell; Cheryl A Fisher; Clare E Hastings; Leanne B Silverman; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.250

Review 3.  Effectiveness of organisational infrastructures to promote evidence-based nursing practice.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes; Nick Cole; David R Foxcroft
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

4.  Describing patient problems & nursing treatment patterns using nursing minimum data sets (NMDS & NMMDS) & UHDDS repositories.

Authors:  C Delaney; D Reed; M Clarke
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

5.  Implementing evidence-based practice: effectiveness of a structured multifaceted mentorship programme.

Authors:  Gwenyth R Wallen; Sandra A Mitchell; Bernadette Melnyk; Ellen Fineout-Overholt; Claiborne Miller-Davis; Janice Yates; Clare Hastings
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Providers' perceptions of spinal cord injury pressure ulcer guidelines.

Authors:  Susan S Thomason; Celinda P Evitt; Jeffrey J Harrow; Linda Love; D Helen Moore; Maria A Mullins; Gail Powell-Cope; Audrey L Nelson
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

7.  An infrastructure to advance the scholarly work of staff nurses.

Authors:  Janet A Parkosewich
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2013-03-12

8.  A systematic review of the individual determinants of research evidence use in allied health.

Authors:  L Lizarondo; K Grimmer-Somers; S Kumar
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-07-26

9.  Why are we not screening for anal cancer routinely - HIV physicians' perspectives on anal cancer and its screening in HIV-positive men who have sex with men: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jason J Ong; Meredith Temple-Smith; Marcus Chen; Sandra Walker; Andrew Grulich; Jennifer Hoy; Christopher K Fairley
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  A process for instituting best practice in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Elisabeth L George; Patricia Tuite
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.