Literature DB >> 10627426

Diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests in subacromial impingement syndrome.

M Caliş1, K Akgün, M Birtane, I Karacan, H Caliş, F Tüzün.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic values of clinical diagnostic tests, in patients with SIS.
METHODS: 72 female, 48 male patients with shoulder pain were included in the study. Five had bilateral shoulder pain, so 125 painful shoulders were evaluated. Details were recorded about the patients' ages and sexes, as well as characteristics of pain and related problems. Detailed physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed. Conventional radiography and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder region of all patients were performed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the results of subacromial injection test, a reference standard test for SIS. Test positive patients constituted SIS group and test negative patients the non-SIS group. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of some clinical diagnostic tests such as Neer, Hawkins, horizontal adduction, painful arc, drop arm, Yergason and Speed tests for SIS were determined by using 2 x 2 table.
RESULTS: The most sensitive diagnostic tests were found to be Hawkins test (92.1%), Neer test (88.7%) and horizontal adduction test (82.0%). Tests with highest specificity were drop arm test (97.2%), Yergason test (86.1%) and painful arc test (80.5%) consecutively.
CONCLUSION: The highly sensitive tests seem to have low specificity values and the highly specific ones to have low sensitivity values. Although this finding suggests that these diagnostic tests are insufficient for certain diagnosis, it is suggested they play an important part in clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10627426      PMCID: PMC1752990          DOI: 10.1136/ard.59.1.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  18 in total

1.  Rotator cuff pathology. Arthroscopic assessment and treatment.

Authors:  S A Wasilewski; U Frankl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Motivation and addiction behaviour: a psychological perspective.

Authors:  B Saunders; C Wilkinson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Observations on impingement.

Authors:  R J Neviaser; T J Neviaser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Sonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff. Accuracy in patients without prior surgery.

Authors:  L A Mack; M K Gannon; R F Kilcoyne; R A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Office evaluation and management of the shoulder impingement syndrome.

Authors:  K P Butters; C A Rockwood
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Rotator cuff sonography: a reassessment.

Authors:  T D Brandt; B W Cardone; T H Grant; M Post; C A Weiss
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report.

Authors:  C S Neer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Rotator cuff disease: a review of diagnosis, pathophysiology, and current trends in treatment.

Authors:  B G Frieman; T J Albert; J M Fenlin
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  [Reliability of clinical examination of the shoulder in comparison with arthroscopy. A prospective study].

Authors:  B M Ure; T Tiling; R Kirchner; D Rixen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Rotator cuff tears: diagnostic performance of MR imaging.

Authors:  M B Zlatkin; J P Iannotti; M C Roberts; J L Esterhai; M K Dalinka; H Y Kressel; J S Schwartz; R E Lenkinski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  54 in total

1.  Effects of a home exercise programme on shoulder pain and functional status in construction workers.

Authors:  P M Ludewig; J D Borstad
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Is local subacromial corticosteroid injection beneficial in subacromial impingement syndrome?

Authors:  Kenan Akgün; Murat Birtane; Ulkü Akarirmak
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Work related shoulder disorders: quantitative exposure-response relations with reference to arm posture.

Authors:  S W Svendsen; J P Bonde; S E Mathiassen; K Stengaard-Pedersen; L H Frich
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Shoulder pain: diagnosis and management in primary care.

Authors:  Caroline Mitchell; Ade Adebajo; Elaine Hay; Andrew Carr
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-12

5.  Clinical evaluation of the shoulder shrug sign.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Jia; Jong-Hun Ji; Steve A Petersen; Jennifer Keefer; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Palpation tests versus impingement tests in Neer stage I and II subacromial impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Deniz Palamar; Kenan Akgun
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  A proposed evidence-based shoulder special testing examination algorithm: clinical utility based on a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Nicklaus E Biederwolf
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08

8.  Comparison of manual therapy techniques with therapeutic exercise in the treatment of shoulder impingement: a randomized controlled pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Aimie F Kachingwe; Beth Phillips; Eric Sletten; Scott W Plunkett
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

9.  REHABILITATION OF SUBACROMIAL PAIN SYNDROME EMPHASIZING SCAPULAR DYSKINESIS IN AMATEUR ATHLETES: A CASE SERIES.

Authors:  Katherinne F Moura; Renan L Monteiro; Paulo R G Lucareli; Thiago Y Fukuda
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-08

Review 10.  Ultrasound-Guided Versus Anatomic Landmark-Guided Steroid Injection of the Subacromial Bursa in the Management of Subacromial Impingement: A Systematic Review of Randomised Control Studies.

Authors:  Charles I Ayekoloye; Osondu Nwangwu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.