Literature DB >> 10627050

Representational difference analysis of cDNA for the detection of differential gene expression in bacteria: development using a model of iron-regulated gene expression in Neisseria meningitidis.

L D Bowler1, M Hubank, B G Spratt.   

Abstract

Representational difference analysis of cDNA (cDNA RDA) provides a powerful technique for the identification of specific differences between two mRNA populations. The method has previously been used to analyse differential gene expression in eukaryotes, but until now has not been successfully applied to prokaryotes. A strain of Neisseria meningitidis with a deletion of the iron-regulated lactoferrin-binding protein A (IbpA) gene, grown under iron-replete conditions, and the isogenic parent strain, grown under iron limitation, were used as a model for developing cDNA RDA for use with bacteria. In this system, the technique should specifically detect the differential expression of the IbpA gene in the parent strain, along with other genes whose expression is switched on (or up-regulated) under iron-deficient conditions. Since cDNA RDA requires high-quality, representative mRNA, a variety of methods for the isolation of RNA were evaluated. A triisopropylnaphthalene sulphonic acid/ p-aminosalicylic acid-based technique was found to give the best results. cDNA was prepared from total RNA isolated from the two N. meningitidis strains and subjected to an adapted cDNA RDA procedure. The method resulted in the amplification of five major PCR products, which included fragments of the IbpA gene and the iron-regulated RTX-like toxin gene (frpC), thus validating the technique for use with bacteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10627050     DOI: 10.1099/00221287-145-12-3529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  8 in total

1.  Detection of differential gene expression in biofilm-forming versus planktonic populations of Staphylococcus aureus using micro-representational-difference analysis.

Authors:  P Becker; W Hufnagle; G Peters; M Herrmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Prokaryotic suppression subtractive hybridization PCR cDNA subtraction, a targeted method to identify differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Susan K De Long; Kerry A Kinney; Mary Jo Kirisits
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Differences in expression of retinal pigment epithelium mRNA between normal canines.

Authors:  Heather L J Hanik; Matthew E Loewen; Greg D Appleyard; Bruce H Grahn; George W Forsyth
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Identification of a differentially expressed oligopeptide binding protein (OppA2) in Streptococcus uberis by representational difference analysis of cDNA.

Authors:  D L Taylor; P N Ward; C D Rapier; J A Leigh; L D Bowler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Current awareness.

Authors:  R Drysdale; L Bayraktaroglu
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 3.239

6.  Next-generation sequencing of representational difference analysis products for identification of genes involved in diosgenin biosynthesis in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum).

Authors:  Joanna Ciura; Magdalena Szeliga; Michalina Grzesik; Mirosław Tyrka
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Application of representational difference analysis to identify genomic differences between Bradyrhizobium elkanii and B. Japonicum species.

Authors:  René Arderius Soares; Luciane Maria Pereira Passaglia
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 2.476

8.  Medical bioremediation of age-related diseases.

Authors:  Jacques M Mathieu; John Schloendorn; Bruce E Rittmann; Pedro Jj Alvarez
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.328

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.