Literature DB >> 10626024

The relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women.

J D Allen1, G Sorensen, A M Stoddard, K E Peterson, G Colditz.   

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between social network characteristics and breast cancer screening practices among employed women. We hypothesized that larger social networks, higher levels of support from networks, and stronger social influences to undergo screening would be positively associated with regular utilization of mammograms and clinical breast examinations. Data were collected from women aged 52 and over who were employed in 27 worksites (N = 1,045). Social network characteristics, breast cancer screening practices, and sociodemographic factors were assessed in a self-administered survey. Bivariate analyses revealed that social influences were significantly associated with regular screening; social support was only marginally associated with regular screening; and social network size was not at all associated. In multivariate analyses, only the perception that screening is normative among one's peers was predictive of regular screening. Provider recommendation was the single most potent predictor of regular screening. These findings provide support for the importance of social norms in motivating women to adhere to screening guidelines. In addition, they underscore the potent impact of provider recommendations on women's screening practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10626024     DOI: 10.1007/BF02884833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  26 in total

1.  The association of social support and education with breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Patricia Documet; Todd M Bear; Jason D Flatt; Laura Macia; Jeanette Trauth; Edmund M Ricci
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-11-12

Review 2.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent practices.

Authors:  Sherri P Varnell; David M Murray; Jessica B Janega; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Do social network characteristics predict mammography screening practices?

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Anne M Stoddard; Glorian Sorensen
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2007-07-09

Review 4.  Social capital and health care access: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kathryn Pitkin Derose; Danielle M Varda
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.929

5.  Do men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the "take the wheel" trial.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Megan K D Othus; Alton Hart; Anshu P Mohllajee; Yi Li; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Race/ethnicity and the socioeconomic status gradient in women's cancer screening utilization: a case of diminishing returns?

Authors:  Shannon M Monnat
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2014-02

7.  Caregiving networks-using a network approach to identify missed opportunities.

Authors:  Laura M Koehly; Sato Ashida; Ellen J Schafer; Amanda Ludden
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Factors influencing adherence to mammography screening guidelines in Appalachian women participating in a mobile mammography program.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Traci LeMasters; Elvonna Atkins; Sara Gainor; Stephenie Kennedy; Kimberly Kelly; Linda Vona-Davis; Scot Remick
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-06

9.  Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Kira Levy; Alexandra M Minnis; Maureen Lahiff; Julie Schmittdiel; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2014-12-07

Review 10.  Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Pinquart; Paul R Duberstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 6.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.