J A Stewart1, F A Short. 1. Respiratory Care Department, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98122, USA. jastewarte@defib.net
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Barcode systems for recording clinical data from resuscitation attempts offer the prospect of more complete and time-accurate data collection; in addition, collection of data in digital form and the resulting ease of computer processing promises to facilitate data analysis for quality improvement and research. We conducted trials of such a barcode system, recording events during a videotaped, simulated in-hospital resuscitation, with particular attention to time accuracy. METHODS: Nine subjects watched a videotape of a simulated cardiac resuscitation, recording events first with the barcode system and then with a conventional handwritten form. Recorded times were compared to an accurate record of events (gold standard) from the videotape. RESULTS: Mean absolute errors and standard deviations of errors from the gold standard were significantly smaller with the barcode system (P < 0.01 for both). Numbers of event omissions did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The barcode system is more accurate than conventional handwritten recording in capturing event times from a simulated resuscitation. The system shows promise as a means to improve time accuracy of resuscitation records.
UNLABELLED: Barcode systems for recording clinical data from resuscitation attempts offer the prospect of more complete and time-accurate data collection; in addition, collection of data in digital form and the resulting ease of computer processing promises to facilitate data analysis for quality improvement and research. We conducted trials of such a barcode system, recording events during a videotaped, simulated in-hospital resuscitation, with particular attention to time accuracy. METHODS: Nine subjects watched a videotape of a simulated cardiac resuscitation, recording events first with the barcode system and then with a conventional handwritten form. Recorded times were compared to an accurate record of events (gold standard) from the videotape. RESULTS: Mean absolute errors and standard deviations of errors from the gold standard were significantly smaller with the barcode system (P < 0.01 for both). Numbers of event omissions did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: The barcode system is more accurate than conventional handwritten recording in capturing event times from a simulated resuscitation. The system shows promise as a means to improve time accuracy of resuscitation records.
Authors: T Grundgeiger; M Albert; D Reinhardt; O Happel; A Steinisch; T Wurmb Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2016-04-16 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Andrew J Goodwin; Danny Eytan; William Dixon; Sebastian D Goodfellow; Zakary Doherty; Robert W Greer; Alistair McEwan; Mark Tracy; Peter C Laussen; Azadeh Assadi; Mjaye Mazwi Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-08-18
Authors: Michael S Dittmar; Sabrina Zimmermann; Marcus Creutzenberg; Sylvia Bele; Diane Bitzinger; Dirk Lunz; Bernhard M Graf; Martin Kieninger Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2021-06-10