Literature DB >> 10625156

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a population-based, prospective randomised clinical trial in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

E Skogvoll1, L Wik.   

Abstract

Different mechanical devices have been developed to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The aim of this study was to evaluate active compression-decompression (ACD) CPR applied by Emergency Medical Service (EMS) in a defined population. The Trondheim region EMS (population 154,000) employs simultaneous paramedic and physician response. Upon decision to treat, patients with cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac origin were allocated to ACD CPR (CardioPump) or standard CPR by drawing a random number tag. Outcome in each patient was determined on a 5 point ordinal scale (no clinical improvement = 1, survival to discharge = 5). In 4 years, CPR was attempted in a total of 431 cardiac arrests, 54 patients (13%) survived to discharge; 302 patients with similar baseline characteristics were randomised. The prevalence of bystander CPR was 57% and the median call-arrival interval 9 min. By intention to treat, the mean score in the standard CPR group was 2.51 and 17/145 patients (12%) survived. The mean score in the ACD CPR group was 2.53 (P = 0.9) and 20/157 patients (13%) survived. Cerebral outcome was similar in the two groups. Among the 145 ACD patients, the technique was successfully applied in 110, found inapplicable in 35 and in seven patients chest compressions were unnecessary. This is the largest, single-centre, randomised, population based study of ACD CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest to date. Even when considering a wider outcome spectrum than crude survival, we found no evidence of clinical benefit. In a quarter of cases ACD CPR was inapplicable, further limiting its potential usefulness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10625156     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(99)00086-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].

Authors:  M Fischer; M Breil; M Ihli; M Messelken; S Rauch; J-C Schewe
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) versus standard CPR for cardiac arrest patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xu-Rui Luo; Hui-Li Zhang; Geng-Jin Chen; Wen-Shu Ding; Liang Huang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lei Jiang; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2011

4.  Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Peter L Wang; Steven C Brooks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-20

Review 5.  Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Diana M Cave; Raul J Gazmuri; Charles W Otto; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adam Cheng; Steven C Brooks; Mohamud Daya; Robert M Sutton; Richard Branson; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Active chest compression-decompression for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente; María Melero-Bascones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-20

7.  The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: shock or CPR? A population based prospective study.

Authors:  Eirik Skogvoll; Trond Nordseth
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  The Development of Innovative Handheld Devices to Augment Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Therapy and External Cardioversion and Defibrillation.

Authors:  Melanie L Gershman; Brandon S Needelman; Sam N Schwarzwald; Todd J Cohen
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-12-15

9.  The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.

Authors:  Robert A Gyory; Scott E Buchle; David Rodgers; Jeffrey S Lubin
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.