Literature DB >> 10625142

The attitudes of Australian GPs to evidence-based medicine: a focus group study.

J Mayer1, L Piterman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the last 6 years there has been an exponential increase in the publication of medical literature on evidence-based medicine. In Australia, as in many other parts of the world, there have been calls for an increase in the practice of evidence-based medicine. In general practice, two major themes of criticism have been the lack of relevant research evidence in primary care and the failure of evidence-based medicine to take into account the complexity of the consultation.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the attitudes of Australian GPs to evidence-based medicine.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using evidence-based guidelines as a model to explore attitudes within focus group interviews. Focus group data were analysed using grounded theory methodology. The study was set in the Australian cities Melbourne, Adelaide and Darwin. The subjects were 27 GPs in five focus groups.
RESULTS: Data were used to generate a model illustrating factors affecting the consideration and use of evidence within consultations. Prior beliefs and experience had a strong influence on decision-making. Overall, the GPs had a positive attitude to evidence-based medicine and stated that this could be a helpful strategy for meeting their information needs. These needs arose during the consultation and were frequently generated by patients. The evidence-based approach was regarded as particularly useful when patients required validation of their management or had specific queries. However, the GPs also expressed some concerns, such as the application of evidence from clinical trials to individuals, and the appropriateness of using research evidence with certain patients. They also feared a move away from the 'art of medicine'. None of the GPs expressed a need for critical appraisal skills.
CONCLUSIONS: The Australian GPs in this study had mixed views about the increasing profile of evidence-based medicine, and the use of this paradigm in practice. Acceptability was more likely to be influenced by relevance to general practice and local contextual and patient factors than by the strength, or critical quality of the evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10625142     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/16.6.627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  33 in total

1.  "Well, have I got cancer or haven't I?" The psycho-social issues for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Simone De Morgan; Sally Redman; Kate J White; Burcu Cakir; John Boyages
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Ethics of evidence based medicine in the primary care setting.

Authors:  A Slowther; S Ford; T Schofield
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Physicians' knowledge of and compliance with guidelines: an exploratory study in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Ute Karbach; Ingrid Schubert; Jens Hagemeister; Nicole Ernstmann; Holger Pfaff; Hans-Wilhelm Höpp
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  [What do general practitioners think about evidenced-based medicine? A study with focus groups].

Authors:  María Carmen Sánchez López; Manuel Madrigal de Torres; Juan Antonio Sánchez Sánchez; Juan Francisco Menárguez Puche; Enrique Aguinaga Ontoso
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  Building bridges: qualitative assessment of a clinical faculty exchange between a naturopathic and an allopathic medical training program.

Authors:  Rachelle L McCarty; Robin Fenn; Barak Gaster; Wendy Weber; Jane Guiltinan
Journal:  Explore (NY)       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.775

6.  Knowledge and Attitudes of Oman Medical Specialty Board Residents towards Evidence-Based Medicine.

Authors:  Aiman Al Wahaibi; Saada Al Adawi; Wafa Al Shehhi; Syed Gauhar A Rizvi; Nasser Al-Kemyani; Khalfan Al-Amrani; Murtadha Al-Khabori
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2014-05

7.  Primary care and public health services integration in Brazil's unified health system.

Authors:  Rogério M Pinto; Melanie Wall; Gary Yu; Cláudia Penido; Clecy Schmidt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Evidence-based medicine among Jordanian family physicians: awareness, attitude, and knowledge.

Authors:  Farihan Barghouti; Lana Halaseh; Tania Said; Abdel Halim Mousa; Adel Dabdoub
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  A qualitative study of evidence in primary care: what the practitioners are saying.

Authors:  Wayne Putnam; Peter L Twohig; Frederick I Burge; Lois A Jackson; Jafna L Cox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Diversity, the individual, and proof of efficacy: complementary and alternative medicine in medical education.

Authors:  Constance M Park
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.